Re: So how many of you voted in the Democratic Primary in Alaska?

"James Of Tucson" <james0tucson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:c056b5fc-d20d-49ba-a63c-aa80e00ce83a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 11, 5:02 pm, "Jim E" <YD639...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Imagine, 406 people electing the nominee for over 600,000 people.
>
> They didn't "elect the nominee"
> They "chose delegates to represent the party."
>
> When the electors from Alaska are sent as the result of something
> other than an at-large
> election (which was a choice left to the legislature of the state),
> then you have an argument.
>
> You seem to have some kind of mistaken believe that the Democratic
> party is a government organization.
>
>
>>Obama is now calling himself a winner, becasue he won so many
>>caucuses?  What a joker he is.
>
> Joker?  I don't think it's a joke to him.
>
> But I also note that he has not "called himself a winner", and in all
> his statements, considers the contest still very much undecided,
> considers his opponent to be worthy, and also, is very realistic about
> the road to the White House.
>
> Your state votes in a couple of days, but I know that your election is
> 100% by mail.  I know you didn't start out as an Obama sup****ter and
> change your mind.  I also know you didn't vote for any Democrat.  I
> know damn well you aren't part of your local Democratic Party
> organization and that you can't describe how it is organized, tell us
> when and where the meetings are and who attends, etc., yet you are
> suddenly an expert, qualified to comment on the Democratic Party's
> nomination process.
>
> It upsets you that the people who read you on USENET don't reinforce
> your feeling of superiority over getting paid by the hour to oil a
> machine in a factory.  I'm happy for you that your expectations are
> met.  I would have moved on to something with intellectual rewards
> long ago.  But that's me.  You're happy.
>
> You *are* happy, right?
>
> It's hard to tell from your posts.  They don't seem very happy
> sometimes.

Aren't you the nut case?  This election is about Obama, not me.  Your
reply 
is the oldest and weakest on the Usenet, attack the poster and divert the 
topic.  I have been there too many times.
The facts are the facts, less than One Percent of the population of Alaska

gave Obama 9 delegates!  406 persons did it and that was not by mail in.I 
will be analyzing other States and posting the stats here from time to
time. 
I already got one email that says Obama has used this same well oiled 
political gimmick and his Chicago Obama boys to win in other States. 
Hillary knows this but cannot reveal the facts for fear of a falling out 
with the DNC, as if she doesn't already have one.