blue_collar_worker wrote:
> On May 11, 2:48 pm, James Of Tucson <james0tuc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 11, 3:29 pm, jerry <GeraldCNew...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > This has happened all
> > > over the USA in many other States and that is why Obama is
> > > winning, he won with the caucuses.
> >
> > And they don't take excuses.
> >
> > And if there is a "hard working person" who did make the effort to
> > be part of the party
> > process, they probably aren't amused at the way you dismiss them.
> >
> > It's a political party. It's not an arm of government. You either
> > participate in its process,
> > or you don't, but you aren't being disemfranchised by some
> > government because you choose
> > not to participate.
> >
> > Elections are different. If you are forbidden from voting in the
> > general election in November, we
> > very much want to hear about that.
> >
> > If you want to be involved in a political party, now is the time to
> > start getting involved, on a daily basis, if you want to be part of
> > it for 2012.
> > They people you are complaining about, all made an effort, and they
> > don't necessarily care that you didn't, or couldn't make the same
> > effort.
> >
> > You admit that you didn't even know how the Democratic Convention
> > Delegates were selected in your state.
> > You probably don't even realize that there is no law that says they
> > have to vote one way or the other -- that the caucuses and in most
> > states, even the primary elections are considered mere suggestions.
> >
> > What other parts of your life did you miss because you were "too
> > busy working?" You must be very wealthy indeed now, having spent so
> > much time working that you had no time for other things.
>
> Imagine, 406 people electing the nominee for over 600,000 people.
> That comes to 7 percent.
Actually, it comes to 0.067 percent. Seven percent would be 42,000.
You're
as strong in arithmetic as you are at everything else, Kwifi. Being
stupid
is the reason that you're a racist.
> That word "Democrat" is very misleading. What do you call it when
> only 7 percent of the people elect the representative for 600,000?
What do you call it when 5 Supreme Court Justices elect the POTUS for
305,000,000? Answer: Republicanism.
> I don't think even the Nazis can find a word for that.
Since you're close to a Nazi, give it a try.
> Something is very wrong here, and someone is pulling the shades down
> on the electorate.
Pulling the shades down? ROTFL!!! You are really Dumber than Dog****.
> How many other States had a similar event?
> So
> Obama is now calling himself a winner, becasue he won so many
> caucuses? What a joker he is.
What a winner he is, Kwifi. Practice saying "President Obama."
|
