In article <af774416-303c-48dd-83c7-
47199eb92b2e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, GeraldCNewton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> I know this information is jarring, and puts DNC delegates in an
> uncomfortable situation, but if the time comes for delegates to
> endorse or get behind a consensus candidate, this information should
> be available. As I wrote to Rep. Capps, I apologize for not
> illuminating this earlier.
>
> My observations in Texas were that caucuses were broadly illegitimate.
> In a few well-run counties, Hillary's caucus vote was the same or
> better than the popular vote, but in chaotic counties, she fell behind
> by double digits. While Texas is the only state to have both a binding
> popular vote and a caucus vote, we saw similar results in Wa****ngton
> State, where Obama's numbers plunged in the unofficial primary
> compared to the caucuses .
>
> This stands out: only four major Texas counties were orderly enough to
> re****t most of their caucus results election night, and in three of
> these, caucus preference mirrored the popular vote (HRC popular/
> caucus): El Paso (69/75), Austin/Travis (37/34), San Antonio/Bexar
> (56/57). In the case of Austin, I have read re****ts that that both
> sides ran their caucuses well.
> SNIPPED...
No matter how long the article you post, etc, people are still
going to know what's up. You can make all the accusations against the
Obama team you want, but you know it's bull.
Dennis Kucinich funded the New Hamp****re recount because it was
noted that "machine counted ballots" favored Hillary, while hand counted
ones favored Obama. In plain language, Hillary did NOT win New
Hamp****re, and Obama did.
In Nevada, the voting places were closed half an hour early after
having been stocked early by Hillary sup****ters. Obama sup****ters
incorrectly believed they had half an hour left to get there and were in
fact "too late". Hillary stole Nevada.
In Indiana, 7% of voters were Republicans who had registered as
Democrats to vote for Hillary, on Rush Limbaugh's advice, because he
correctly acknowledged that Hillary is the weaker candidate against
McCain. A Republican helped her steal Indiana, PLUS - Lake County seemed
to have an awful problem (where Obama was HEAVILY FAVORED) to count
their votes before everyone knew how many Hillary nee... I mean... they
were late.
There have also been allegations about the Texas vote, and not
against Obama my willfully delusional friend.
Everyone knows what Hillary, her team, and the people in the media
who favor her (and re****t none of the above) are up to. It's over.
Now she's trying to get Florida and Michigan included so she can
stay in by the skin of her teeth. She ought to use the skin on her face,
since she has plenty there.
The fact is, it's her propaganda machine that's claiming that she
would win either handily. Obama's name wasn't even on the Michigan
ballot. If Michigan is allowed into the process, the vote count will be
fixed, and her campaign has spent months claiming she's wildly popular
there.
|
