MirTopolskiRexPrez <2472-810@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<chhv1c$d6u$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> Bill Palmer wrote:
> >MirTopolskiRexPrez wrote:
> >>Bill Palmer wrote:
> >>
> >>>Why is it that right then an explosive would become
> >>>"untaped," or "fall out of a basketball hoop" as
> >>>Russian governmental sources have suggested?
> >>>
> >>>Could it be that the "volunteers" were Russian
> >>>security agents in disguise, who were in that
> >>>truck in the alley as the result of a cold-
> >>>blooded decision to attack and kill the hostages
> >>>and hope for as few casulties as possible?
> >>
> >>Hardly. Because first paragraph (above) is lying about "Russian
> >>governmental sources" - I saw this story being re****ted live by the
> >>hostages. Of course a sicko of your ilk can assume that both the
> >>"terrorists" and those kidnapped Ossetian "children" were in fact
> >>Russian security agents in disguise, but who gives a crap about
moronic
> >>crap?
> >
> > Well, it may be beyond the range of
> > your narrow mind to even entertain the
> > "wild notion" that those "volunteers"
> > in the alley might have been Russian
> > agents. Maybe they were not, I have no
> > way of knowing, but why is that scenario
> > such an absurd possibility to you?
>
> I replied "hardly", weirdo. Being beyond the range of mind has different
> modality. But I saw live on TV with my own eyes children who escaped
> Chechen slaughter telling about "fall out of a basketball hoop" story
> referred to as "Russian governmental sources" in your premise. Ergo your
> wild conclusion is based on lies.
Your remarks shows you are far too shallow to
be posting in alt.conspiracy, WEIRDO. There
were at least one-thousand people in that
school, and apparently even a couple of hundred
survivors. Okay, did it not occur to you
that these panicked, traumatized children, and
even adults, who survived are subject to drawing
all sorts of conclusions about what they did or
did not see? SIMPLETON! Did it not occur
to you that the children you listened to
may have been put before that camera
precisely because they were, in their
innocent confusion, making comments which
were far removed what actually took place?
That they were -- with all sincere intention
on their part -- making, what were for certain
others, convenient "red herring" statements?
Mr. Palmer
Room 314 in the upstairs office
|
