You left-wing buttboys squeal in girlish rage when Christian parents rebel
against Monkey-lution and now you squeal when Muslims don't want
Christianity put on them. Why do you squealing left-wing buttboys defend
Monkey-lution and the Muslim religion, but won't defend Christianity? You
squeal about losing freedom, but yet you squeal the loudest to try to take
freedoms away. As long as it's Christians who lose their freedoms. What's
up
with that?
<easytoremember123@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1149299018.512736.162490@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> One of the most incredible pieces of propaganda to have come out of CNN
> happened right after the Beslan terrorist attack. For several days the
> entire free press was bad-mouthing Russia, so much that the free press
> itself had to admit a few times that it was crossing the line. For
> example, CNN showed someone expressing shock at the jabs that the free
> press was taking at Putin right after the Beslan massacre (during one
> of the segments that CNN runs during commercials, in which they run
> audio clips of the opinions of everyday people who phone in to CNN to
> express their views on a given subject). There were a few other
> comments in other free press channels in which they noted how they
> themselves (!) were crossing the line in attacking Russia and its
> President so soon after the Beslan massacre. Even President Putin made
> an angry comment about this fact during a press conference.
>
> The free press was constantly talking about how the massacre was
> somehow the fault of the Government of Russia. So different from their
> treatment of 9/11, where the amazing and surreal oversights that
> allowed 9/11 to happen were ten times worse than in Beslan. The free
> press also tried very hard, as it has always done, to separate in the
> minds of the viewers, the muslim terrorists in Chechnya from the whole
> global terrorist muslim network that they always talk about. Despite
> the fact that Russia has captured truckloads of foreign muslim
> terrorists inside Chechnya working side by side with the Chechen
> terrorists. And despite the fact that Pakistan, which isn't exactly
> friends with Russia, has admitted that they have captured and killed
> dozens of Chechen terrorists inside their borders in the mountain
> region, fighting side by side with the other muslim guys that we ARE
> supposed to believe belong to the international muslim terrorist
> conspiracy.
>
> But the kicker came a few days after Beslan, and it aired on CNN.
>
> CNN did a live interview (I think) with a Russian woman in Moscow, who
> was a member of one of those extremely suspicious "independent" "NGO"
> type organizations that receive millions from the US State Department
> every year (if Russia tried to plant something like that in Wa****ngton
> DC the US would close it down in 48 hours). I think it might have been
> the Carnegie Center in Moscow. The interview was a trip. This woman,
> who was in her 30's or 40's, had long curly hair, and was kinda ugly,
> was sitting slumped in her chair, stiff as a rock. It immediately
> called your attention. Normally the people they put on screen are
> sitting upright and with good posture. She was sitting like that for a
> good reason. As the interviewer asked her questions, she answered in a
> drone-like monotone voice, and her eyes were darting left and right
> like if she was following a ping pong match. It was as obvious as hell
> that she was reading from a teleprompter. It was a fake staged
> interview, with the almost certain collaboration of the editors of CNN.
> That's bad enough. But what was truly horrendous was what they wrote
> for her to repeat.
>
> The interview revolved entirely around the possibility that the muslim
> attack might mark the beginning of a widening of the conflict
> throughout the southern provinces of Russia. The scripted answers were
> roughly along the lines of "yes", "yes", and "please God, let it be
> so". The only thing the ugly traitor to her country didn't do to stress
> enough her point was to pray on camera that all of southern Russia
> become engulfed in the flames of muslim terrorism. It was a surreal
> interview. And all the time, this ugly little human garbage was sitting
> there stiff, like a statue, sunk in her chair, with her eyes moving
> wildly and her voice sounding almost mechanical. She was having such a
> hard time reading that half the time she forgot to pause for a
> punctuation mark. It would have been kind of funny, if it wasn't so
> sickening. CNN was hopping aboard the "op****tunity" created by the
> massacre to inflame the already very crisp nerves by spreading tales of
> mutual hatred to everyone in the region who could listen. It was like
> they were cheering: "Yes, yes, go for it, this is it. This is the
> kickoff. Muslims of southern Russia, unite and join your Chechen
> brothers against Russia."
>
> There were some other re****ts along this line from the free press in
> those weeks, but this was by far the worst. Russia has long accused
> Georgia of flat out helping the Chechen terrorists. They have indicated
> exactly where in Georgia these terrorists are making a base (it's a
> valley about 20 km south of the border, and very close to a US military
> base). The leading faggots in the US White House belong to an
> organization that openly calls for the independence of Chechnya
> (imagine if Putin belonged to an organization openly calling for the
> independence of California). Chechen terrorists have escaped from
> Russian justice by going to London and Wa****ngton DC, where they have
> been granted asylum. One of these mini-Osamas was so clearly a
> terrorist that the US decided to ****p him to the US colony of U.A.E.,
> instead. Russian intelligence located him there, and Russia presented
> evidence to the U.A.E. and to the U.N. that the guy was a terrorist.
> His name was Yandarbiyev. The U.N. agreed that the evidence was valid.
> The U.A.E. was just about to extradite him when a bomb killed this
> mother****er outside of a mosque he always attended. The U.A.E.
> immediately arrested the 2 Russian agents who had been shadowing him
> for months, and it later turned out that the US was very heavily and
> eagerly involved in helping the U.A.E. arrest them (frame them,
> actually). The arrest was heavily publicized by the free press,
> strongly implying (or plainly stating) that Russia planted the bomb
> against him, which would have been moronic, since they had just won the
> fight to prove to the world that he was a terrorist and now he would be
> extradited and spill his guts about his network (he was an extremely
> high ranking terrorist within the Chechen terrorist groups). The 2
> Russians were convicted and sentenced to 30 years or life, I don't
> remember exactly. But 2 months later they were quietly released,
> without a peep from the free press, because of lack of evidence. Wow. A
> canary who knew too much. And this time, the US couldn't save him.
> Russia's evidence had the backing of the UN. Too embarrasing to
> continue to protect him. No way out of this mess. Wait... BOOM. Problem
> solved. Now nobody will tell the Russians what goes on in the terrorist
> base just across the border (and so close to a US military base).
>
> Another criminal case from CNN is Jill Dougherty. When the muslim
> terrorists took 1000 civilians hostage in the Moscow Theater (an
> unquestionable, crystal-clear textbook-perfect terrorist attack), Jill
> Dougherty repeatedly referred to the terrorists as "dissidents" (the
> same word the free press uses to describe people fighting for
> humanitarian causes against the grain of a dictator****p). Later she
> toned it down and called them "rebels". A few years ago she made an
> entire one hour program about one thing: "the black widows". The "black
> widows" are the women in Chechnya who commit suicide bombings. Jill
> interviewed them, she explained how their actions were unjustifiable
> but comprehensible (with a concerned look on her face), and I think I
> even recall her nodding in agreement as a Chechen woman said to her
> that she understands why a woman would commit a suicide bombing against
> the Russians.
>
> An honorable mention goes to Christian Amanpour, of CNN, who's father
> was a high ranking collaborator in the US colonial government of Iran
> in the 1950's and 60's, and who is now married to James Rubin, former
> White House press spokesman (!!!!!). She also made her own little hour
> long do***entary on the horrors of the Russian leveling of Grozny, etc.
> She laughed at the official estimates of 10,000 dead, and said it was
> probably 100,000, because NGO's say so. Wow, so different from CNN's
> treatment of Iraq, where it says the civilian deaths are "in the
> thousands" or simply repeats without challenge an official Pentagon
> estimate of how many died "in violence" (10,000), and then even adds
> that most of these people were killed by insurgents. The unofficial
> estimates are now in the hundreds of thousands, and the leveling of
> Fallujah makes Grozny look like a nice place to live in.
>
> 9/11 happened, and we were all supposed to be Americans. Beslan
> happened, and CNN spits on Russia and scripts a fake interview
> purposefully designed to inflame the situation when the tensions are
> running high. CNN is an agency of the Government of the US. This is
> war. This is the Great Game.
>
|
