On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:41:17 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"Len McLaughlin" <len@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:47adcd00$0$4034$9a566e8b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> -- "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:13qqnrdbmjth7cb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> After years, decades, even centuries of a silent war against white
anglo
>>> peoples and their associated cultures and religions, it is necessary
to
>>> formulate and engage in a pro-white agenda. Not as an act of hate,
>>> destruction or violence against other ethnicities, but as an act of
>>> defense
>>> aimed to avoid needless suffering of generations of innocent, unaware
>>> victims of a most insidious plan of systematic ethnic cleansing.
>>>
>>> Whenever and wherever possible within the bounds of the law:
>>>
>>> Vote white. Marry white. Procreate white. Hire white. Promote white.
>>> Purchase white. Educate white. Learn white. Defend white. Organize
white.
>>>
>> =========================
>> ''What has changed ?'' is the question I often ask myself. In past
>> centuries the white race didn't hesitate to fight back and in the
process
>> they came to dominate most of the world militarily and economically and
in
>> the arts and science. With this domination, as with all past empires,
>> there came a compliancy and a belief in their own immortality as a race
>> and that they had nothing to fear as a race.
>>
>> So what was the only enemy that could defeat them? It's basically
>> 'culture' combined with a mixture of democracy and liberalism.
>> After 1945 and the decline of the British empire, the Labor government
>> open up the country to all the citizens of their colonies.
>> Of course with democracy and unlimited rights, etc and brain dead
liberals
>> world wide, this same thinking spread and was enshrined into law in
Canada
>> by Trudeau.
>>
>> I've gotta go, so we can pick up the thought later and if I have any of
my
>> facts wrong I'm sure some liberal will let me know.
>> -lm
>>
>
>You have raised a particularly interesting point in regard to cause;
though
>some speculation may be required. I will offer this:
>
>-------
>
>When I was walking on the path of life merrily minding my own business,
not
>bothering anyone and I first came upon the "obstruction" in my path,
which
>before then I was unaware and which was completely unilluminated, I
reached
>out with my hand and felt what seemed to be a tail. Some people tapped me
on
>the shoulder and whispered, "Its an elephant..". This was such a bizarre
>notion that I dismissed the words outright as a product of paranoia,
>delusion, hate mongering or some political hidden agenda. As time went by
>and more obstructions were presented to me, I began to make my way around
>the dark object and it began to take shape. It was now becoming more
evident
>that the object could very well be what was first uttered. Continuing
around
>the monolith, from back to the side, front and finally to the back again,
it
>was no longer possible to dismiss the reality of this unthinkable,
>unspeakable reality.
>
>Looking back at the path where I had come, I noticed the unmistakable
signs
>of the elephant's existence such as the trodden grass and its dung
castings.
>I thought, how remarkable that such a creature could exist and absent
>illumination, remained for the most part invisible until one had the
>misfortune to encounter it directly. Of course, in an attempt to alert
>others of the bizarre creature, my words were also dismissed as I had
done
>when the information was first whispered to me.
>
>How odd then, that having no knowledge of elephants in this location, nor
>having studied elephants before, that someone else, in fact a good many
>individuals have resolved to the same conclusion and for all intent and
>purpose independently.
>
>Strange that some people, well educated and close knit, voice in unison
the
>same chant of, "no such thing as elephants".
>
>-------
>
>I'm not a history buff or much interested in politics, but one of those
>independent, mutually inclusive conclusions was the policy that in
Canada,
>PET administration was responsible for. (My father often rants of the man
>with disparaging remarks such as, "That god damned Truduea was a faggot
and
>international financiers blackmailed him to introduce policies which have
>since destroyed this country). There is little evidence to suggest any of
>that is true of course, but even my own conclusions about what went wrong
>led back to that man.
>
>We had left Britain in the mid 60's and it seems, the same policies were
>taking place there. Later I found the same policies were taking place on
a
>global scale in every industrialized country in the world.
>
>I'm still trying to figure it all out. It's still seems quite bizarre but
>there comes a time when it is impossible to ignore. This rogue "elephant"
>must be brought down and not severely injured only to recover and become
an
>obstacle again for other unwitting victims, but destroyed permanently,
once
>and for all. ( I used to love and admire elephants)
>
>
>
Damn! Now I'm dying to see Len's response to your post Meldon. I hope
he won't be away too long. :)
|
