On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>> You still haven't answered the question. What does "hire white,
>> promote white" mean?
>>
>
>It means to hire white and promote white.
As opposed to what alternative?
>
>
>>>>
>>>> You wish me to re-frame it; so much so, that
>>>>>you re-frame it for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>Perhaps since you've asked me three redundant questions and asserted
a
>>>>>lie,
>>>>>you will allow me to ask one question of you. Why is it
discriminatory
>>>>>to
>>>>>refuse to hire someone with poor English language skills?
>>>>
>>>> It isn't.
>>>
>>>It is as you are more than aware. Feigning ignorance of a threat, while
>>>attempting to convince people there is no such threat is vile and
>>>repugnant
>>>beyond human. Here is at least some substance to sup****t my claim and I
>>>will
>>>choose to ignore the obvious lack of substance that you have provided
with
>>>your claim. Please pay special attention to the phrases "special
>>>measures...
>>>to correct the conditions of disadvantage".
>>>
>>>Please also note that Employment Equity while it applies to the Federal
>>>Workforce, has equivalent programs (read: pogrom), in the general
>>>workforce
>>>known as Diversity Programs.
>>>
>>>"achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied
>>>employment op****tunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability
and,
>>>in the fulfillment of the goals, to correct the conditions of
disadvantage
>>>in employment experienced by women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with
>>>disabilities, and visible minority people by giving effect to the
>>>principle
>>>that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same way
>>>but
>>>also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences."
>>
>> So where are poor English language skills mentioned?
>
>It's not.
Then that isn't especially relevant now is it?
|
