"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:9grvq3pp6ci202eh8mq5lmig1om8o6bjsm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>> You still haven't answered the question. What does "hire white,
>>> promote white" mean?
>>>
>>
>>It means to hire white and promote white.
>
> As opposed to what alternative?
The alternatives are not my immediate concern and have nothing to do with
this thread but feel free to begin a new one which examines them.
>
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You wish me to re-frame it; so much so, that
>>>>>>you re-frame it for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Perhaps since you've asked me three redundant questions and asserted
a
>>>>>>lie,
>>>>>>you will allow me to ask one question of you. Why is it
discriminatory
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>refuse to hire someone with poor English language skills?
>>>>>
>>>>> It isn't.
>>>>
>>>>It is as you are more than aware. Feigning ignorance of a threat,
while
>>>>attempting to convince people there is no such threat is vile and
>>>>repugnant
>>>>beyond human. Here is at least some substance to sup****t my claim and
I
>>>>will
>>>>choose to ignore the obvious lack of substance that you have provided
>>>>with
>>>>your claim. Please pay special attention to the phrases "special
>>>>measures...
>>>>to correct the conditions of disadvantage".
>>>>
>>>>Please also note that Employment Equity while it applies to the
Federal
>>>>Workforce, has equivalent programs (read: pogrom), in the general
>>>>workforce
>>>>known as Diversity Programs.
>>>>
>>>>"achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied
>>>>employment op****tunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability
>>>>and,
>>>>in the fulfillment of the goals, to correct the conditions of
>>>>disadvantage
>>>>in employment experienced by women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with
>>>>disabilities, and visible minority people by giving effect to the
>>>>principle
>>>>that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same
way
>>>>but
>>>>also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences."
>>>
>>> So where are poor English language skills mentioned?
>>
>>It's not.
>
> Then that isn't especially relevant now is it?
English language skills are irrelevant?? ROFLMA
|
