On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:30:58 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:9grvq3pp6ci202eh8mq5lmig1om8o6bjsm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> You still haven't answered the question. What does "hire white,
>>>> promote white" mean?
>>>>
>>>
>>>It means to hire white and promote white.
>>
>> As opposed to what alternative?
>
>The alternatives are not my immediate concern and have nothing to do with
>this thread but feel free to begin a new one which examines them.
I see no reason to. Is there some reason why you avoid explaining
what you mean?
>
>>>>>"achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied
>>>>>employment op****tunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability
>>>>>and,
>>>>>in the fulfillment of the goals, to correct the conditions of
>>>>>disadvantage
>>>>>in employment experienced by women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with
>>>>>disabilities, and visible minority people by giving effect to the
>>>>>principle
>>>>>that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same
way
>>>>>but
>>>>>also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences."
>>>>
>>>> So where are poor English language skills mentioned?
>>>
>>>It's not.
>>
>> Then that isn't especially relevant now is it?
>
>English language skills are irrelevant??
I can see why you'd think so. After all, you religiously avoid making
any clear statements.
|
