"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:5ouvq3t2iq8cqarnvp84p58qml8dr9l965@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:30:58 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:9grvq3pp6ci202eh8mq5lmig1om8o6bjsm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You still haven't answered the question. What does "hire white,
>>>>> promote white" mean?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It means to hire white and promote white.
>>>
>>> As opposed to what alternative?
>>
>>The alternatives are not my immediate concern and have nothing to do
with
>>this thread but feel free to begin a new one which examines them.
>
> I see no reason to. Is there some reason why you avoid explaining
> what you mean?
It means what it says. Why do you require remedial help?
>
>>
>>>>>>"achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be denied
>>>>>>employment op****tunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to
ability
>>>>>>and,
>>>>>>in the fulfillment of the goals, to correct the conditions of
>>>>>>disadvantage
>>>>>>in employment experienced by women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with
>>>>>>disabilities, and visible minority people by giving effect to the
>>>>>>principle
>>>>>>that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same
>>>>>>way
>>>>>>but
>>>>>>also requires special measures and the accommodation of
differences."
>>>>>
>>>>> So where are poor English language skills mentioned?
>>>>
>>>>It's not.
>>>
>>> Then that isn't especially relevant now is it?
>>
>>English language skills are irrelevant??
>
> I can see why you'd think so. After all, you religiously avoid making
> any clear statements.
Mine was not a statement. English language skills are relevant (that is a
statement), but I can see why you would think they were not, since you
have
repeatedly demonstrated such poor comprehension that you require special
assistance.
|
