"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:fruvq31prb38kse9sm146r1pjlp09nppu1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:28:50 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:7irvq3p4p1or60sed4jlsia0ungrn4g3uo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:21:43 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:imdvq3dk3ilkcp5r6l6bkrodif94hqg2dm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:05:48 -0400, "Len McLaughlin"
<len@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>-------------------------------------------
>>>>>>The color of the skin by itself is not the problem
>>>>>
>>>>> The title of the thread says otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>It doesn't. - ROFLMA
>>>
>>> So then you are suggesting that more buildings be painted white?
>>
>>Where does it say, "pro-white paint"? - ROFLMA
>
> So what do you mean?
>
>>
I mean, pro-white agenda as it pertains to ethnicity. Does that help?
|
