On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:26:55 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:fruvq31prb38kse9sm146r1pjlp09nppu1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:28:50 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:7irvq3p4p1or60sed4jlsia0ungrn4g3uo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:21:43 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>news:imdvq3dk3ilkcp5r6l6bkrodif94hqg2dm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:05:48 -0400, "Len McLaughlin"
<len@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>The color of the skin by itself is not the problem
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The title of the thread says otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>>It doesn't. - ROFLMA
>>>>
>>>> So then you are suggesting that more buildings be painted white?
>>>
>>>Where does it say, "pro-white paint"? - ROFLMA
>>
>> So what do you mean?
>>
>>>
>
>I mean, pro-white agenda as it pertains to ethnicity. Does that help?
>
So the colour of the skin by itself IS a problem?
|
