by "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Feb 11, 2008 at 01:56 PM
"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:mvs0r3hm0651g0bign4bgihrffurkqk9sb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:30:39 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:sm10r3p8rlgupeq2fe3t6cm9gtl7gvlrs4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:56:21 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I see no reason to. Is there some reason why you avoid explaining
>>>>> what you mean?
>>>>
>>>>It means what it says.
>>>
>>> It says nothing. "White" is just a colour.
>>
>>White as it pertains to ethnicity.
>>
>
> Whites are already being hired and promoted. Mission accomplished.
It took so many posts to make such an erroneous claim?
I have not claimed whites are not currently being hired and promoted.
