"Deborah" <deborah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:hc71r35sqd0gkctv34itr71hbh6djkjnc5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:49:08 GMT, David Johnston <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:16:18 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"David Johnston" <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:ctnuq3l8v5hf1ulhljkqir4r6citumc4f4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 03:06:44 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>There is nothing wrong with white Anglo business owners preferring to
>>>>>hire
>>>>>other white Anglos. Every other ethnic group is allowed to do this.
>>>>
>>>> No, they aren't.
>>>
>>>Nothing in current law *prevents* a member of an ethnic group other
than
>>>white anlgo, from hiring other members of the same ethnic group.
>>
>>Actually nothing in current law prevents white people from hiring
>>other members of the same ethnic group. Most of the white bosses I
>>see do have white employees.
>
> True.
Of course there are employed whites. Wow! What a revelation.
Both of you are way off the mark and your motives are suspect, especially
DJ
who subscribes to 500 newsgroups, posts an average of 104 posts per day
including holidays for a total of more than 38,000 in one year!
|
