Re: 100,000,000 Killed

Andre Lieven wrote:

> O
> > >> More than one hundred million is the approximate combined number of
> > >> fallen
> > >> soldiers from both world wars. The vast majority were caucasian
males.
> > >> Neither war directly threatened North America.
> >
> > > Where do you get the 100 million figure. There were 8.5 million
soldiers
> > > killed in WW I and  almost 6 million killed in WW II. Of those,
there were
> > > 1,7
> > > million Japanese and 3.5 million Chinese casualties.  The war
between
> > > China
> > > and Japan started a few years before war broke out in Europe and it
was
> > > another 2 years before Japan attacked the US.
> >
> > > As for North Americans, they suffered among the lowest number of
> > > casualties.
> >
> > My figures include North America and the allies only and was sourced
from
> > Wikipedia.
>
> What a suprise ( not ) that you are full of **** once again:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties
>
> Human Losses of World War Two by Country
>
> Military deaths
>
> Totals  25,160,000
> ---------------
> Of which 10,700,000 military deaths were of Soviet personnel.
> Last time I looked at a WW2 map, the USSR was NOT a part of
> North America.
> ---------------
>
> Nor, for North American military deaths, here they are:
> Canada: 45,300.
> USA: 416,800
> Mexico: 0
>
> Now, people with functioning brains ( This specifically excludes
> you... ) can figure out that 45,300 + 416,800 + 0 is a bit less than
> a hundred million. Like 99,537,900 less than 100,000,000.. DUH !
>
> > Where did you get your numbers
>
> Wikipedia.
>
> > and who's counting enemy combatants.?
>
> You, many many times over. Illiterate gob.

The numbers are irrelevant when they are both selective and fabricated.
:-)