Re: 100,000,000 Killed

"Dave Smith" <adavid.smith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:47BCDC47.3AA54BEA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Andre Lieven wrote:
>
>> O
>> > >> More than one hundred million is the approximate combined number
of
>> > >> fallen
>> > >> soldiers from both world wars. The vast majority were caucasian
>> > >> males.
>> > >> Neither war directly threatened North America.
>> >
>> > > Where do you get the 100 million figure. There were 8.5 million
>> > > soldiers
>> > > killed in WW I and  almost 6 million killed in WW II. Of those,
there
>> > > were
>> > > 1,7
>> > > million Japanese and 3.5 million Chinese casualties.  The war
between
>> > > China
>> > > and Japan started a few years before war broke out in Europe and it
>> > > was
>> > > another 2 years before Japan attacked the US.
>> >
>> > > As for North Americans, they suffered among the lowest number of
>> > > casualties.
>> >
>> > My figures include North America and the allies only and was sourced
>> > from
>> > Wikipedia.
>>
>> What a suprise ( not ) that you are full of **** once again:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties
>>
>> Human Losses of World War Two by Country
>>
>> Military deaths
>>
>> Totals  25,160,000
>> ---------------
>> Of which 10,700,000 military deaths were of Soviet personnel.
>> Last time I looked at a WW2 map, the USSR was NOT a part of
>> North America.
>> ---------------
>>
>> Nor, for North American military deaths, here they are:
>> Canada: 45,300.
>> USA: 416,800
>> Mexico: 0
>>
>> Now, people with functioning brains ( This specifically excludes
>> you... ) can figure out that 45,300 + 416,800 + 0 is a bit less than
>> a hundred million. Like 99,537,900 less than 100,000,000.. DUH !
>>
>> > Where did you get your numbers
>>
>> Wikipedia.
>>
>> > and who's counting enemy combatants.?
>>
>> You, many many times over. Illiterate gob.
>
> The numbers are irrelevant when they are both selective and fabricated.
> :-)
>

How ironic. So there was no white holocaust? lol