"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmcvay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:13ruqkfspit0s16@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <13ru7m5cq3lmj9c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Meldon Fens <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>As so few people are aware or willing to admit of such a possibility, it
>>stands to reason that fewer people are able to express their concerns in
a
>>respectful manner. I have also "lashed out" in frustration and anger
until
>>I
>>reviewed "hate laws". (Those are the laws that pretend to prohibit hate
>>toward everyone while in fact allowing hate against caucasians.)
>
> Please show how Canada's anti-hate legislation allows hate against
> Caucasians. Cite the
> appropriate Federal and Supreme Court of Canada rulings.
>
Simple. By virtue of DISTINGUI****NG between races, cultures and religions,
the law allows hate to transpire against Caucasians. Evidence of this
selective method of protection is found in statements such as "...groups
that are in a minority situation and that have historically suffered...".
There is no perceived historical suffering or minority situation of white
anglos and therefore a different and selective protection is readily
apparent for that group. Short form - whites, caucasians, anglos and so
on,
ARE TREATED DIFFERENT. In any other form this would be considered
discriminatory but the law is drafted in this fa****on and is clearly not
by
accident.
"...Considering the abject nature of the messages and their likely impact
on
individuals and groups that are in a minority situation and that have
historically suffered from precisely the kind of bias underpinning these
vile attacks, it could be assumed that the harm suffered will have a
long-term impact and may be extremely difficult to repair...." -
T-1309-05,
2005 FC 1493
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/chrt/doc/2007/2007chrt49/2007chrt49.html
Further, every other group can be racist but not white / anglo /caucasian
and this is demonstrated when evidence such as a white person who wishes
not
to associate with non-whites for example, "I just don't feel the need to
be-friend non-whites, as they can do nothing for me, nor would I like to
associate with them. I am fine with my own kind, and always will/have
been."
Clearly, expressing this sentiment in public can be considered illegal
since
the statement is used as evidence against the respondent.
"...I just don't feel the need to be-friend non-whites, as they can do
nothing for me, nor would I like to associate with them. I am fine with my
own kind, and always will/have been..." - T1106/8705, 2007 CHRT 49
http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=hate+white&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/ca/chrt/doc/2007/2007chrt49/2007chrt49.html
In a case where a respondent expressed theories of conspiratorial nature,
the subject itself was also used as evidence against them. Once again it
is
clear, expressing this sentiment in public can be considered illegal since
the statement is used as evidence against the respondent.
"...the messages expounded the "theory" that Jewish people operate a
secret
conspiracy designed to extort money and amass tremendous power and control
on a global level.." - T1071/5205 - 2006 CHRT 50
http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/chrt/doc/2006/2006chrt50/2006chrt50.html
There are many more examples of cases of this nature successfully argued.
However, even after extensive research, I could not locate a single case
of
a white European, or caucasian obtaining remedy or even having a complaint
filed. In other words, there appears to be little if any caucasian
complainants and even less successfully argued cases of caucasian
complainants. This is easily explained when there no "white advocacy"
groups
available to take the cases. By comparison, every other group is offered
protection by virtue of advocates and non-profits involved with
"anti-hate"
activities. I can just imagine the hilarity that occurs when some poor
bastard applies for government funding for a non-profit advocacy of white
anglo protectionism. After the laughter stops, the application is swiftly
rejected.
I'm sure I'm not going to convince you. It is part of your job to defend
your position. You have a vested financial interest in policing the
internet. As for people like me, we are just trying to make sense of the
insane bull**** and if we're lucky, survive. When you get down to the
heart
of it, the motivation behind fascism in the form liberal ideals is profit
and nothing more. By comparison, people like me, marginal to begin with,
are
suffering the immense burden of liberal-left policies in order to placate
every other group that can be imagined. Personally, I'm hoping for a
poverty
study that indicates dramatic increases in white, anglo or caucasian
poverty
levels. Of course, that can't happen in a political climate that defines
such an action as racist.
The only reason I am forced to speak in terms of race, ethnicity, culture
or
religion to begin with is the fallacy of equality (equity) laws which seek
equal outcomes as determined by race, ethnicity, culture or religion. It
is
clear, the laws have been crafted using distinction of race, ethnicity,
culture and religion by design. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. did not promote
this kind of human rights as referenced in the famous, world renowned and
highly regarded speech in which he states:
"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation
where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the
content
of their character." - MLK's dream
It should be clear to anyone at this point the dream has been reversed and
legislated as follows, ""I have a dream that my four little
children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by
the
content of their character but by the color of their skin ." - MLK's
nightmare
|
