"Fuzzy" <notlikely@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:m05vr313chbo8v5ur0akc29faes3rnbqp0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Affirmative action operates under the premise that white males are
> already represented in the courts and politics. This is simply not
> true. Match them by race and color and lose the hypocrisy (incentives
> for more teachers, nurses, etc... where ever they're under
> represented, including the supreme court of canada).
>
>
> Btw, auto insurance is a joke. Men are involved in fewer accidents and
> pay a higher premiums. If my wife or kid doesn't drive, there's no way
> I should be paying more.
>
> It's bad to defame every person of a race but ok to defame an entire
> gender (especially if he's white). CRTC regulation doesn't come close
> to enforcing it's own criteria where men are concerned.
> (and let's not forget "women as positive role models" has turned into
> outright hatred towards men)
>
> Violence against women funding obviously excludes the men even though
> violence against men make the former statistically insignificant.
>
> Children and men are a loaves of bread giving dispro****tionate
> representation in the market place (a fact not missed by many).
>
> The zeal of the abortion activists typically alienate children (who
> happen to be male) from the human race.
>
> Could probably name off a few hundred more if you want. I'm not
> liberal and I hate canada (tossed away like a used tampon and I want
> to stay tossed away. There'll never be a future for me here).
You're describing one brick in the wall and I have no doubt you have
experienced it first hand otherwise you would not be posting here. My
question to you is, if not here then where? Even if financially you could
do
so, where the hell are you going to go?
Its pretty tragic but you're not alone. There is a great deal of
discussion
taking place, even in the media of such topics but they are heavily
shrouded
in political "code". It's partly why it is so difficult to figure out. For
instance, what do you do if yelling "fire" is illegal even when your house
is burning?? How can any discussion take place without risking legal
liability? So what we see is political pundits using every other word
still
legal to describe what is taking place and for most of us, its very
difficult to decode. Orwell comes to mind when he spoke of "new speak"
versus "old speak" and so on.
Whatever is going on, it is global in nature with very few exceptions. The
exceptions if any, are hardly worth considering since those countries are
the global outcasts. Some possibilities may be Cuba although not for long,
Venezuela and perhaps Iran. I know, crazy, but you can bet any nation that
refuses to cooperate immediately gets a "bad boy" reputation so I would
bet
the ones ****trayed in the worst way are very likely the only places left
to
which escape can offer remedy. Everywhere else is already FUBAR.
|
