On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>"Fuzzy" <notlikely@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:579vr3h1e54qfpbau0c19nn6a38hs7f6bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:32:58 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Fuzzy" <notlikely@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:m05vr313chbo8v5ur0akc29faes3rnbqp0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>You're describing one brick in the wall and I have no doubt you have
>>>experienced it first hand otherwise you would not be posting here. My
>>>question to you is, if not here then where? Even if financially you
could
>>>do
>>>so, where the hell are you going to go?
>>>
>> It's not too bad actually... All that love and care that was meant for
>> many is now exclusively your own. If you think about it and can tap
>> into it it's wonderful thing. The loss shows itself daily in the
>> newspaper and on the tele.
>>>
>>>Its pretty tragic but you're not alone. There is a great deal of
>>>discussion
>>>taking place, even in the media of such topics but they are heavily
>>>shrouded
>>>in political "code". It's partly why it is so difficult to figure out.
For
>>>instance, what do you do if yelling "fire" is illegal even when your
house
>>>is burning?? How can any discussion take place without risking legal
>>>liability? So what we see is political pundits using every other word
>>>still
>>>legal to describe what is taking place and for most of us, its very
>>>difficult to decode. Orwell comes to mind when he spoke of "new speak"
>>>versus "old speak" and so on.
>>>
>> Legitimacy in the new world comes with a price and sometimes imitation
>> is the greatest form of flattery.
>>
>> Commercials are a great education and there's no excuse why each gap
>> cannot be filled.
>>
>> Trust (monetary law) and what may come and bite you in the ass are
>> entirely two different things.
>>
>> A bit cryptic, I guess. Eh?
>>>
>>>Whatever is going on, it is global in nature with very few exceptions.
The
>>>exceptions if any, are hardly worth considering since those countries
are
>>>the global outcasts. Some possibilities may be Cuba although not for
long,
>>>Venezuela and perhaps Iran. I know, crazy, but you can bet any nation
that
>>>refuses to cooperate immediately gets a "bad boy" reputation so I would
>>>bet
>>>the ones ****trayed in the worst way are very likely the only places
left
>>>to
>>>which escape can offer remedy. Everywhere else is already FUBAR.
>>>
>> Many things...
>>
>> What was held by a few now belongs to many. Affluence and social
>> networking at the global scale *was* the pride of very few
>> (governments, media, business, etc...) and now is as common as indoor
>> plumbing.
>>
>> Globalization is an eventually, intentionally or not, natural behavior
>> will do it on it's own. The choices are be a part of it and bring to
>> it what you represent (remember legitimacy) or inadvertently serve it
>> (possibly against your own better interests).
>>
>> Canadian fems have been making leaps and bounds (general population).
>> If that's the trouble then get out and talk, the language is now
>> there.
>>
>> ...
>
>I didn't understand anything you said. Must be me or the bot you're
using.
>
>Birds and fish are often observed with yellowish thunder shoveling snow
from
>rooftops of civilian clothing. Yeesh!
>
No bots here but me...
Where am I going? Probably no where. Just a progressive ****ft in my
responsibilities and identity.
|
