"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmcvay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:13s0e7132l25568@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <13rve9lf7ikr246@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Meldon <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmcvay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:13rv9hgl716fd6a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In article <13rv38dij6btu10@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> Meldon Fens <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmcvay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>news:13ruqkfspit0s16@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> In article <13ru7m5cq3lmj9c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>> Meldon Fens <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>As so few people are aware or willing to admit of such a
possibility,
>>>>>>it
>>>>>>stands to reason that fewer people are able to express their
concerns
>>>>>>in
>>>>>>a
>>>>>>respectful manner. I have also "lashed out" in frustration and anger
>>>>>>until
>>>>>>I
>>>>>>reviewed "hate laws". (Those are the laws that pretend to prohibit
>>>>>>hate
>>>>>>toward everyone while in fact allowing hate against caucasians.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Please show how Canada's anti-hate legislation allows hate against
>>>>> Caucasians. Cite the
>>>>> appropriate Federal and Supreme Court of Canada rulings.
>>>
>>>>Simple. By virtue of DISTINGUI****NG between races, cultures and
>>>>religions,
>>>>the law allows hate to transpire against Caucasians. Evidence of this
>>>
>>> Evasion noted, Mr. Fens. Please cite the appropriate Federal and
Supreme
>>> Court of Canada judgments which sup****t your allegation.
>>>
>>> While your opinion may be interesting, your record of deliberately
lying
>>> in this forum precludes taking anything you say seriously.
>>>
>>> Cite the judgments, Mr. Fens.
>>>
>>
>>You are an idiot. Perhaps if you learned to read we'd all be better off.
I
>>guess all those citations and quotes were lies - you ****ing moron. I
hear
>>they have some good weed on the island. Perhaps that would explain your
>>propensity to ignore anything which does not serve your selfish purpose.
>>PARASITE! Here ya go - VOMIT.
>
> Can't cite any Federal or Supreme Court judgments, eh, Mr. Fens?
> Gee, there's a surprise.
>
I did but what you mean to say is, they don't meet your definition.
Perhaps
if you carefully and without ambiguity describe what I need to provide you
with we can reach a suitable conclusion?
|
