In article <13s0ji9spa9jme6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Meldon <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmcvay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:13s0e7132l25568@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <13rve9lf7ikr246@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Meldon <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmcvay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>news:13rv9hgl716fd6a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> In article <13rv38dij6btu10@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>> Meldon Fens <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmcvay@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>news:13ruqkfspit0s16@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> In article <13ru7m5cq3lmj9c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>> Meldon Fens <meldon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>As so few people are aware or willing to admit of such a
possibility,
>>>>>>>it
>>>>>>>stands to reason that fewer people are able to express their
concerns
>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>respectful manner. I have also "lashed out" in frustration and
anger
>>>>>>>until
>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>reviewed "hate laws". (Those are the laws that pretend to prohibit
>>>>>>>hate
>>>>>>>toward everyone while in fact allowing hate against caucasians.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please show how Canada's anti-hate legislation allows hate against
>>>>>> Caucasians. Cite the
>>>>>> appropriate Federal and Supreme Court of Canada rulings.
>>>>
>>>>>Simple. By virtue of DISTINGUI****NG between races, cultures and
>>>>>religions,
>>>>>the law allows hate to transpire against Caucasians. Evidence of this
>>>>
>>>> Evasion noted, Mr. Fens. Please cite the appropriate Federal and
Supreme
>>>> Court of Canada judgments which sup****t your allegation.
>>>>
>>>> While your opinion may be interesting, your record of deliberately
lying
>>>> in this forum precludes taking anything you say seriously.
>>>>
>>>> Cite the judgments, Mr. Fens.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You are an idiot. Perhaps if you learned to read we'd all be better
off. I
>>>guess all those citations and quotes were lies - you ****ing moron. I
hear
>>>they have some good weed on the island. Perhaps that would explain your
>>>propensity to ignore anything which does not serve your selfish
purpose.
>>>PARASITE! Here ya go - VOMIT.
>>
>> Can't cite any Federal or Supreme Court judgments, eh, Mr. Fens?
>> Gee, there's a surprise.
>>
>
>I did but what you mean to say is, they don't meet your definition.
Perhaps
>if you carefully and without ambiguity describe what I need to provide
you
>with we can reach a suitable conclusion?
CITE THE JUDGMENTS, MR. FENS, which show that our anti-hate laws "allow
hate
to transpire against Caucasions."
Anything else is just more of your smoke and mirrors.
--
"In the final analysis, one does not refute a closed system, a total
lie that is not refutable to the extent that its conclusions has
preceded any evidence." (Vidal-Naquet, Pierre. Assassins of Memory,
New York: Columbia University Press. p.81)
|
