"Nawiedzony" <nawiedzony@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:mIyhd.76223$9b.41402@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "The NATO Citizen" <esla****te@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:T2dhd.15536$ta5.12849@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > The hostage takers are black-hooded, well-armed chicken****s, COWARDS!
> > Sun, Oct 31 2004
> > http://www.pronato.com/commentary/index.htm
> >
> > Well, there are those who argue that those who are taking unarmed and
> > defenseless aid workers hostage - and brutality decapitating them -
are
> > engaging in "resistance" and "a struggle for freedom."
> >
> > Really?!
> >
> .....
> > Anybody who sympathizes with these bunch of cowards - who are really,
> > without their weapons, nothing more than costumed 'trick or treating'
> > children - is likewise a coward and an enemy of the humanity and the
> > international community. To give any sort of credence to these bunch
of
> > murdering cowards, for what ever reason, makes you an enemy of
humanity
> and
> > you are part of the criminal problem in both Iraq and Afghanistan. To
> place
> > yourself in their camp makes you an enemy of humanity and the
> international
> > community!
>
>
> Just generally speaking, you don't understand much, do you?
> Some are aid workers, some aren't, but the message to you and your
troops
is
> to get the **** out of Iraq, no buts and ifs. And apologize on the way
out
> for barging in uninvited.
>
> From Al-Jazeera (
>
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/BA590075-7765-4122-B54B-EEAA8A7A1926.htm
)
>
> "Perhaps one of the more famous statements on the subject was made by
the
> late Shaikh Mahmud Shaltut: "Anyone working in the enemy military camps
and
> factories is one of them and may be killed."
> ...
>
> "The war effort is not restricted to those who just carry weapons. The
war
> effort includes trans****t and supplies. Aren't supply lines part of
military
> activity?"
> "An Iraqi interpreter working for an American soldier - isn't that part
of
> the war effort? Undoubtedly, all those killed were not civilians.""
>
Now let me ask you, what would your family say, if you were murdered,
because someone doesn't agree with policies of your country, and you
are "guilty by association", because you are paying taxes, from which
military is financed, and therefore you are "not civilian"? Probably
nothing, because they would be killed too, because they are also
"guilty by association" with *you*, ardent military sup****ter.
Anyway, there is no need to go to such lengths with pseudo-
arguments. For them killing of infidels is justifiable enough.
Infidel, of course, being anyone whom they decide to kill. Be it
average American or Iraqi aid worker or moderate sheik.
|
