Re: 'View' Co-Hosts Blame Woman Persecuted by Sudan

Thanatos wrote:
> In article <475b589b$0$15346$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  FDR <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> Thanatos wrote:
>>> In article <1i8sm55.s9raae1hh2nznN%csampson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>  csampson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Charles H. Sampson) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanatos <atropos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <4759efd2$0$9543$4c368faf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>>>>  FDR <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ubiquitous wrote:
> 
>>>>>>> NewsBusters' Justin McCarthy is rightly appalled at
>>>>>>> the ladies' blasé attitude toward the Sudanese threat
>>>>>>> to beat or execute an innocent woman.
> 
>>>>>> What says she was innocent?
> 
>>>>>> "Sudanese President Omar al-Ba****r granted her a
>>>>>> presidential pardon earlier Monday, and she left
>>>>>> the country hours later under court order.
> 
>>>>>> Sudanese courts ruled she should be de****ted after
>>>>>> completing her sentence."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here she would be innocent, there she isn't.
> 
>>>>> Yeah, and the Jews in Auschwitz were "guilty", too.
> 
>>>> Were the Jews in Auschwitz found guilty of anything?
>>> Yep. Being Jewish.
>> So this woman who got arrested was because she was English? I mean, 
>> jeez, she had been there quite a while.  She was allowed into the 
>> country as a matter of fact.  If they didn't want English people there 
>> they could have just turned her back at the air****t.  But  go ahead, 
>> flounder around in your comparison.
> 
> Logic and critical thinking isn't your strong point, is it?

When you're ready to make a logical comment, go ahead.