"Visual Purple" <DoreenDotan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:20fdcd4e-5a2e-48b1-ae65-60f216222a86@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The source for the following excerpt is given:
>
> "According to William Guy Carr, in Pawns In The Game, the initial
> meeting of these ex officio planners took place in Mayer Amschel
> Bauer's Goldsmith Shop in Frankfurt in 1773. Bauer, who adopted the
> name of "Rothschild" or Red Shield, from the red shield which he hung
> over his door to advertise his business (the red shield today is the
> official coat of arms of the City of Frankfurt), (See Cover) "was only
> thirty years of age when he invited twelve other wealthy and
> influential men to meet him in Frankfurt. His purpose was to convince
> them that if they agreed to pool their resources they could then
> finance and control the World Revolutionary Movement and use it as
> their Manual of Action to win ultimate control of the wealth, natural
> resources, and manpower of the entire world. This agreement reached,
> Mayer unfolded his revolutionary plan. The project would be backed by
> all the power that could be purchased with their pooled resources. By
> clever manipulation of their combined wealth it would be possible to
> create such adverse economic conditions that the masses would be
> reduced to a state bordering on starvation by unemployment... Their
> paid propagandists
Are these people basically paid to go spread rumors? Is that what is
meant
in that sentence? If so, I can say that such paying of people to go
spread
rumors is occurring a lot now in America, mianly because people are so
poor
they will do almost anything for money.
would arouse feelings of hatred and revenge against
> the ruling classes by exposing all real and alleged cases of
> extravagance, licentious conduct, injustice, oppression, and
> persecution. They would also invent infamies
Would that be like, for example, if I wrote strong articles in opposition
to
the Federal Reserve and the $300 billion it gets free each year, would
they
spend some of that $300 billion to attack opponents like me? Defamation?
False stories?
Would another example of these corrupt tactics be in making up false
derogatory stories about the Germans during and after WWII?
to bring into disrepute
> others who might, if left alone, interfere with their overall plans...
> Rothschild turned to a manuscript and proceeded to read a carefully
> prepared plan of action.
> 1. He argued that LAW was FORCE only in disguise. He reasoned it was
> logical to conclude 'By the laws of nature right lies in force.'
> 2. Political freedom is an idea, not a fact. In order to usurp
> political power all that was necessary was to preach 'Liberalism' so
> that the electorate, for the sake of an idea, would yield some of
> their power and prerogatives which the plotters could then gather into
> their own hands.
> 3. The speaker asserted that the Power of Gold had usurped the power
> of Liberal rulers.... He pointed out that it was immaterial to the
> success of his plan whether the established governments were destroyed
> by external or internal foes because the victor had to of necessity
> ask the aid of 'Capital' which 'Is entirely in our hands'.
> 4. He argued that the use of any and all means to reach their final
> goal was justified on the grounds that the ruler who governed by the
> moral code was not a skilled politician because he left himself
> vulnerable and in an unstable position.
> 5. He asserted that 'Our right lies in force. The word RIGHT is an
> abstract thought and proves nothing. I find a new RIGHT... to attack
> by the Right of the Strong, to reconstruct all existing institutions,
> and to become the sovereign Lord of all those who left to us the
> Rights to their powers by laying them down to us in their liberalism.
> 6. The power of our resources must remain invisible until the very
> moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning or force can
> undermine it. He went on to outline twenty-five points.
> Number 8 dealt with the use of alcoholic liquors, drugs, moral
> corruption, and all vice to systematically corrupt youth of all
> nations.
> 9. They had the right to seize property by any means, and without
> hesitation, if by doing so they secured submission and sovereignty.
> 10. We were the first to put the slogans Liberty, Equality, and
> Fraternity into the mouths of the masses, which set up a new
> aristocracy. The qualification for this aristocracy is WEALTH which is
> dependent on us.
> 11. Wars should be directed so that the nations engaged on both sides
> should be further in our debt.
> 12. Candidates for public office should be servile and obedient to our
> commands, so that they may readily be used.
> 13. Propaganda--their combined wealth would control all outlets of
> public information.
> 14. Panics and financial depressions would ultimately result in World
> Government, a new order of one world government."
>
> The Rothschild family has played a crucial role in international
> finance for two centuries, as Frederick Morton, in The Rothschilds
> writes:
>
> "For the last one hundred and fifty years the history of the House of
> Rothschild has been to an amazing extent the backstage history of
> Western Europe."38 (Preface)... Because of their success in making
> loans not to individuals, but to nations, they reaped huge profits,
> although as Morton writes, p. 36, "Someone once said that the wealth
> of Rothschild consists of the bankruptcy of nations."
>
> Source: http://www.whale.to/b/m_ch5.html
>
> And this from the same source:
>
> "John Pierpont Morgan [we know the Morgans bankrolled the Nazis, my
> parentheses] was born in 1837, during the first money panic in the
> United States. Significantly, it had been caused by the House of
> Rothschild, with whom Morgan was later to become associated.
> In 1836, President Andrew Jackson, infuriated by the tactics of the
> bankers who were attempting to persuade him to renew the charter of
> the Second Bank of the United States, said, "You are a den of vipers.
> I intend to rout you out and by the Eternal God I will rout you out.
> If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and
> banking system, there would be a revolution before morning."
>
> Although Nicholas Biddle was President of the Bank of the United
> States, it was well known that Baron James de Rothschild of Paris
> [whose son, Edmund, was the "beneficent philanthropist who set up the
> settlements in Israel, my parentheses] was the principal investor in
> this central bank. Although Jackson had vetoed the renewal of the
> charter of the Bank of the United States, he probably was unaware that
> a few months earlier, in 1835, the House of Rothschild had cemented a
> relationship with the United States Government by superseding the firm
> of Baring as financial agent of the Department of State on January 1,
> 1835."
>
> Bank Yisra'el functions in this country as does "the Fed" in the US.
>
> It behooves us to research just exactly what the "philanthropist"
> Baron Edmund de Rothschild set up here in his "beneficence".
>
> At least one Montefiore married into the Rothschild family as well.
> "Henriette ("Jette") (1791-1866) married Abraham Montefiore
> (1788-1824)" [Source: http://tinyurl.com/2bq86f].
>
> We know that during the Mandate the British tipped the demographic
> balance in this area, which led to the Jewish-Arab hatred that exists
> today.
>
> The British government would not have lifted a hand without the
> express approval of the Rothschild family.
>
> We, the entire Jewish People, have borne the brunt of the hatred that
> the plan of these people rightly aroused.
>
> They saw to it that that would be the case.
>
> These are not bone of our bone, or flesh of our flesh.
>
> Let us cut the malignant growth out. Or, if we cannot do that, at
> least let us see to it that they are excommunicated as Jews and
> distance ourselves from them utterly.
>
> D2
>
|
