Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Artificial Language > Re: A simple gr...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 3 Topic 550 of 651
Post > Topic >>

Re: A simple grammar for review

by Dana Nutter \ deinx nxtxr <li_sasxsekREMOVETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 23, 2007 at 11:20 PM

li [Logan Kearsley] mi tulis la ...

> Parts of speech- Nouns, Pronouns, Verbs, Modifiers, Conjunctions, 
> Adjunctions, Particles
> 
> Level 1-
> The default sentence structure is (Agent)-Verb-(Patient). The agent can
be 
> omitted for passive sentences, or the patient for intransitive verbs.
There 
> are no declinations or conjugations.
> Modifiers (adjectives, adverbs) are all listed after the word they
modify.
> Case particles (agent, patient, source, beneficiary, comitative, 
> instrumental, locative) are placed immediately before the noun they
apply 
> to; they're optional for agent/patient, but including them allows you to

> vary the phrase order.
> Tense and aspect are indicated by tem****al particles placed immediately 
> before the verb. The default is present imperfective.
> 
> That should be more than enough to construct coherent sentences capable
of 
> expressing whatever you want, although the results may not be elegant.
So, 
> built over that there's Level 2-
> 
> Prepositional particles placed immediately before a noun form 
> modifier-phrases that act exactly like single-word modifiers.
> Conjunctions are placed between clauses, nouns or noun phrases, and
verbs or 
> verb phrases.
> Adjunctive clauses may be placed before or after the clause they modify;
if 
> after, the two clauses are separated by the introducing adjunction; if 
> before, the clauses are separated by an adjunctive particle (roughly 
> equivalent to English "then").
> Relative clauses must immediately follow the noun phrase they modify,
and 
> are introduced with a relative pronoun (with an optional case particle,
if 
> it's not the agent of the relative clause).
> Complement clauses are introduced with a complementive particle (roughyl

> equivalent to English "for" or "that"), preceded by an optional case 
> particle.
> 
> Questions/Comments?

Is this supposed to be some type of ergative-absolutive
alignment rather than nominative-accusative?


-------------------------------------------------
deinx nxtxr

LI SASXSEK LATIS. (http://www.nutter.net/sasxsek)
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
A simple grammar for review
"Logan Kearsley"  2007-09-22 15:57:52 
Re: A simple grammar for review
Dana Nutter \ deinx nxtxr  2007-09-23 23:20:45 
Re: A simple grammar for review
"Logan Kearsley"  2007-09-23 21:47:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 7:44:47 CDT 2008.