Re: Conlang journal

In article <211020070448108254%none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, X. Rayburn <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> In article <1192952380.333320.85620@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> James Landau <savegraduation@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> > Despite the deletion of Toki Pona in 2006 as non-notable, Toki Pona
> > had to be notable before two newspapers wrote articles about it in
> > 2007.
[big snip]
> The evilness of a thing is directly pro****tional to the number of
> participants. Wikipedia is a massively collaborative project and can
> therefore never be a good (sensible, logical, happy) thing.

Yeah!  Just like conlangs with more than 10 speakers!

Or *society*!1!

Thanks --

David

(Remove "xx" to reply.)