On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:55:51 -0500, Anonymous
<anyone@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>Back in August the Los Angeles Times did a fine article about
>conlangery. For anyone who didn't see the article, it is archived at
> http://tinyurl.com/2tfjmm
>
>(Just making a note here so I can find the info again if I misplace my
>handwritten data)
Thanks for the link!, though it wonders me the LA Times thinks
conlanging is somehow "new". Maybe they're confusing awareness of
conlangs, via the web for this babelonian explosion of new conlangs.
They were already there, I'm sure. Just hidden, secreted away in
notebooks and assorted papers; so much nonsense that would be binned
by the casual observer, unaware of its true nature.
Padraic
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
