Re: "Worldlangers unite!"

li [Padraic Brown] mi tulis la ...
 
> I don't see anywhere in there where they are promoting a *particular*
> auxlang called "Worldlang". Of course, it could be the meandering
> number (mixing of singular and plural) that has me confused. They seem
> to be promoting many languages that use worldwide influences.
>
> In any event, even if this group is dedicated to a single particular
> auxlang, what's the problem with that? It's perfectly sensible,
> especially for auxlangers, to separate themselves into particular
> language oriented groups of this sort. It's really no different than
> the conlang related groups that are designed for showcasing and
> discussion of a particular conlang.

It's not for a particular auxlang.  I made it to isolate some of
the discussion we have about worldlangs away from auxlang.
Auxlang is notorious for repeating the same debates over and
over again, often with religious fervor.  This list is a small
sanctuary away from all that so we can remain more productive.\


-------------------------------------------------
deinx nxtxr

LI SASXSEK LATIS. (http://www.nutter.net/sasxsek)