by Rick Harrison <not@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Feb 10, 2008 at 04:03 PM
In article <Xns99E7B850B7C3Cvictor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, nettoyeur
<victor-the-cleaner@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I often wonder about Latin based planned languages. They're interesting,
> in that they're intelligible somewhat to most people. On the other hand,
> if one is going to go to the trouble, he ought to simply advocate
> learning Classical Latin as it is.
>
> It's not a difficult language to learn, aside from conjugations and
> declensions.
There's the rub: conjugations and declensions. Esperanto is at the
extreme upper limit of morphological complexity that most auxlang fans
will tolerate. Classical Latin is way over the limit.
