It's been years since I've posted here...
I am searching for a certain constructed language. It was created
during the height of popularity of the auxlang movement, which won't
make it easy...
Unlike the majority of auxlangs, it was naturalistic in grammar and
vocabulary, based on the theory that a 'beautiful' and naturalistic
language would be easier to learn than an 'ugly' and artificial
system. It used a "completely regular" affix system, similar to
Esperanto, but unlike Esperanto, the results created by this system
looked like natural words. On first sight, (and on several more), it
seemed more like a quaint little branch of the Romance language than
an auxlang.
And if it helps, I think I came to know this language as I was
researching influences for an Interlingua article. And it's not
Esperanto (naturally), Ido, Idiom Neutral, Intal, Interglossa, Latino
Sine Flexione, Novial, Occidental, Romanova, or Volap=FCk.
Does this ring any bells?
-- Shanya Almafeta
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Face annos que io non ha postate hic...
Io cerca un certe conlingua. Esseva create durante le zenit del
popularitate del movimiento auxlinguistic, que no lo facilitara...
No como le majoritate de auxlinguas, esseva naturalistic in su
grammatica e su vocabulario, basate sur le theoria que un lingua
'belle' e naturalistic sea plus facile a apprender que un systema
'fede' e artificial. Teneva un systema de affices "puramente
regular," como Esperanto, pero no como Esperanto, le resultatos de
iste systema se pareva como parolas natural. Al prime vista, (et al
plure alteres), pareva plus como un variation obscur de la familia
Romance que un auxlingua.
E si se adjuta, io crede que io me cognosceva con iste lingua cuando
io recercava influentias pro un articulo re Interlingua. E non esse
Esperanto (naturalmente), Ido, Idiom Neutral, Intal, Interglossa,
Latino Sine Flexione, Novial, Occidental, Romanova, o Volap=FCk.
Esque alicuno la recognosce?
-- Shanya Almafeta
|
