S. Almafeta <almafeta@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> It's been years since I've posted here...
Nice to see you again.
> It used a "completely regular" affix system, similar to
> Esperanto, but unlike Esperanto, the results created by this system
> looked like natural words. On first sight, (and on several more), it
> seemed more like a quaint little branch of the Romance language than
> an auxlang.
Sounds like the claims that were made for de Wahl's system.
Do you remember any particular words from the language?
If you get no answer in this forum, try your luck on the Auxlang list.
Some of the active particpants there are real gourmets of eurolangs --
they can spot the minute differences between one project and another,
while to the rest of us, the eurostyle auxlangs all look alike. Auxlang
list is headquartered at
http://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A0=AUXLANG
|
