Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Anarchy > The Love Song o...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 2611 of 2832
Post > Topic >>

The Love Song of Buckminster Fuller

by Dan Clore <clore@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 14, 2008 at 04:39 PM

News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo

http://tinyurl.com/4h5e93
June 15, 2008
Architecture
The Love Song of R. Buckminster Fuller
By JAMES STERNGOLD
PALO ALTO, Calif.

AS the designer R. Buckminster Fuller liked to tell it, his powerful 
creative vision was born of a moment of deep despair at the age of 32. A 
self-described ne’er-do-well, twice ejected from Harvard, a failure in 
business and a heavy drinker, he trudged to the Chicago lakefront one 
day in 1927 and stood there, contemplating suicide. But an inner voice 
interrupted, telling him that he had a mission to discover great truths, 
all for the good of humankind.

That was the pivot on which, he claimed, his life turned. The onetime 
loser entered a period of such deep reflection that he was struck 
silent, then emerged bursting with creativity as he developed the 
“Dymaxion” inventions: technologies that he promised would transform 
housing, trans****tation, urban organization and, eventually, the human 
condition. From 1927 on, Fuller seemed utterly self-assured, even 
messianic, as he developed innovations like the geodesic dome, equal 
parts engineering élan and poetry.

Those pioneering creations will go on display next week in “Buckminster 
Fuller: Starting With the Universe,” a sprawling show at the Whitney 
Museum of American Art that testifies to the wide-ranging intellectual 
curiosity of Fuller (1895-1983), who inspired several generations with 
his quixotic vision and his zeal for the liberating power of technology.

But recent research has shed new light on Fuller’s inner life and what 
really drove him. In particular, it now appears that the suicide story 
may have been yet another invention, an elaborate myth that served to 
cover up a formative period that was far more tumultuous and unstable, 
for far longer, than Fuller ever revealed.

That is one of many insights gleaned by researchers who have begun 
exploring the visionary’s personal archives, deposited in 1999 at the 
Stanford University library by his family.

Because he believed his ideas and life would hold enduring interest, 
Fuller collected nearly every scrap of paper that ever passed through 
his hands, including letters that raise questions about the suicide 
story. At 45 tons, it is the largest personal archive at Stanford, 
according to Hsiao-Yun Chu, a former assistant curator of the papers and 
co-editor of a book, “Re*****sing R. Buckminster Fuller,” to be 
published by Stanford University Press next year.

Barry Katz, a Stanford historian who wrote one of the studies in Ms. 
Chu’s book, said, “If you really look for the details of his life at the 
time, it’s easy to see that the suicide story was a creation.”

“There was nothing even remotely in the archives suggesting feelings on 
the scale he later described” in 1927, he said.

In 1927 Fuller, living in Chicago, and his wife, Anne, in New York, 
exchanged almost daily letters and telegrams. Not a single one makes 
reference either to thoughts of death or to an epiphany. In addition, 
Mr. Katz said, he found references to lectures that Fuller gave and 
other evidence that he was far from silent.

Mr. Katz said he found instead signs of depression and anxiety 
stretching from the time his first daughter, Alexandra, died in 1922, 
through his financial failures and, finally, the collapse of a torrid 
extramarital romance in 1931. Still, he said, the suicide story seemed 
to serve a purpose.

“That’s why I now call it a myth, but it was an effective myth. It gave 
a trajectory to his career. The story was constructed after the fact to 
show how he suddenly developed these new ideas. I think he came to 
believe the story himself.”

On a recent day in the library Ms. Chu gave a sort of guided tour of the 
personality known as Bucky, rummaging through boxes of his letters, 
overdue bills, drawings and writings. Over the course of the visit a 
detailed inner ****trait emerged of a man known for his pioneering 
designs for inexpensive, prefabricated houses suspended from masts, a 
highly efficient teardrop-shaped auto and then a series of structural 
designs that were strong yet lightweight and remarkably graceful.

Ms. Chu held up a crinkly letter written by Fuller in 1931, when he was 
a regular at Romany Marie’s cafe in Greenwich Village and intriguing 
friends like Isamu Noguchi with prophecies on how his automotive and 
housing technologies would help usher in a new era of plenty. “He used 
to drink like a fish,” Noguchi would recall years later in an interview 
with Time magazine.

What his friends did not know was that Fuller was becoming unhinged 
because of the collapse of an affair with Evelyn Schwartz, or Evy. 
Fuller was 36, with a wife and 4-year-old daughter, Allegra; Ms. 
Schwartz had just turned 18. The two exchanged letters almost daily, 
with Fuller writing that their relation****p was “completely my 
realization of the ideal of love.”

He wrote of marrying her, of her apparent efforts to get pregnant, and 
insisted, “Evy you and I bear a universal responsibility of forward 
thinking for which we are extraordinarily gifted.”

But when she decided she had “gotten over” him, as he related it, Fuller 
unleashed a cascade of desperate letters. He admitted to stalking her at 
her Brooklyn home “so that you may have no feeling of panicky
abandonment.”

In the most revealing note, feverishly scribbled in heavy block letters 
across four large sheets of onion-skin drafting paper, Fuller confessed 
that he had suffered a “nervous breakdown” in 1931 — not 1927 — because 
of the romantic tumult. “Later in his life, when he was lecturing all 
the time, people loved him, he made them feel very special,” said Ms. 
Chu. “He was an oracle, a guide, and he was so confident. But when he 
was writing those early letters, he didn’t know who he was.”

Jay Baldwin, a designer who helped to edit the Whole Earth Catalog 
(which was inspired by Fuller) in the 1960s, knew Fuller and wrote a 
book about him, said that he learned of the affair during his own search 
of the archives but chose not to mention it.

“To a lot of us he just seemed so much the master of his emotions, but I 
read those letters, and he just lost it,” Mr. Baldwin said. “It wasn’t 
the only thing like that. He wrote one paper about his ideas early on 
that sounds like a raving maniac.”

In Mr. Baldwin’s view those episodes missed the point. “Focusing on the 
affair is like spending all your time thinking about van Gogh’s ear 
instead of his paintings,” he said. “It’s very off track.”

Mr. Katz disagreed, saying that the seemingly crazy writings were 
im****tant because they showed that in recurrent dark periods Fuller was 
not trying only to persuade others his ideas were im****tant, but to 
persuade himself that he mattered. The letters, Mr. Katz suggested, were 
a form of self-encouragement as Fuller struggled to find a reason for 
going on.

Sup****ting that view is Evelyn Schwartz Nef. “Those days were really 
quite exciting because he was so convincing that he was trying to save 
the world,” she said in an interview. Now 94 and a retired 
psychotherapist, she recalled Fuller vividly. “The question I had is 
whether he was as convinced as we were. He was trying to reassure 
himself that he was something.”

Fuller’s daughter, Allegra Fuller Snyder, a retired professor of dance 
at the University of California, Los Angeles, said she was not surprised 
to learn that the 1927 epiphany may not have been literally true.

“It was a kind of parable of his interior thinking, really,” Ms. Snyder 
said. Because he had such a powerful personality and was so well known 
for his unshakable self-confidence, few understood, as she did, that he 
had interludes of real doubt, often because of concern for his family’s 
financial well-being, she said. “That was part of Daddy, always,” she
said.

She recounted another occasion on which her father seemed to find 
inspiration at an especially dark moment. Fuller had tried to turn his 
prefabricated housing idea into a business after World War II by teaming 
with the Beech Aircraft Company in Wichita, Kan., and other investors. 
But in 1946, after prototypes were built, the project collapsed.

Ms. Snyder distinctly recalled her father coming home to their small 
apartment utterly despondent. She said she went to bed then got up in 
the morning only to find that he had been up all night working at a 
small wooden table.

“I remember very well that he was talking about this new thing, the 
geodesic dome,” she said. “That’s what he said to me. He’d been working 
on what he called synergetic geometry before that, but suddenly he saw 
the fusion of that with the structure. That was when the idea came 
together for him.”

By 1948 Fuller developed his first dome prototype; in 1954 he had 
perfected the structure and took out a patent on the dome, one of his 
more memorable, and profitable, designs.

For all his creative energy, Fuller’s legacy is slippery. By 
conventional measures he accomplished little. The efforts to 
mass-produce his houses, though written about widely, failed. His 
project to develop his efficient three-wheeled autos collapsed after an 
accident killed the driver of one. His soaring geodesic domes, built 
with a distinctive pattern of triangles, have been used — memorably for 
the United States pavilion at Expo 67 in Montreal — but never for the 
large-scale projects he envisioned, like the dome he hoped would cover 
most of Manhattan.

But Fuller had great influence through his design principles and his 
almost endless series of lectures and writings. His book “Operating 
Manual for Space****p Earth” helped make him a symbol of the 
counterculture. He even influenced some Silicon Valley pioneers.

For Ms. Chu one of the great insights of the archives is the sheer 
number of letters Fuller received and wrote. He nearly always responded 
personally to every note. (When a former collaborator in his design 
work, Kenneth Snelson, wrote angrily in 1979 that Fuller was unfairly 
claiming credit for what Fuller called the tensegrity structure, Fuller 
responded with a 51-page rebuttal.) “He didn’t just write this 
incredible number of letters, he saved them all,” she said. “It was 
almost like they proved he existed, that he mattered. The files were 
almost like the proof he needed.”

As Mr. Katz put it, “Fuller’s greatest invention was not a house or a 
car or a dome. It was himself.”

-- 
Dan Clore

My collected fiction: _The Unspeakable and Others_
http://tinyurl.com/2gcoqt
Lord Weÿrdgliffe & Necronomicon Page:
http://tinyurl.com/292yz9
News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo

Skipper: Professor, will you tell these people who is
in charge on this island?
Professor: Why, no one.
Skipper: No one?
Thurston Howell III: No one? Good heavens, this is anarchy!
-- _Gilligan's Island_, episode #6, "President Gilligan"
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
The Love Song of Buckminster Fuller
Dan Clore <clore@[EMAI  2008-06-14 16:39:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 2:47:25 CDT 2008.