Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Anarchy > Legal Challenge...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 2625 of 2836
Post > Topic >>

Legal Challenge in Line w/ Plots to Disrupt GOP Convention (Anti-Anarchist

by Dan Clore <clore@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 25, 2008 at 09:24 PM

News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo

http://tinyurl.com/3qbfqb
Legal challenge is in line with plans to disrupt GOP convention
By KATHERINE KERSTEN
Star Tribune
June 24, 2008

Elaborate plans are underway to encircle and "shut down" the Republican 
National Convention at St. Paul's Xcel Energy Center in September. The 
strategies and tactics involved could come straight from a guerrilla 
warfare manual.
[But in fact those that Kersten actually mentions are just non-violent 
civil disobedience of the sort Gandhi and Martin Luther King advocated 
and used.--DC]

Anarchist groups with ominous names -- the RNC Welcoming Committee, 
Unconventional Action -- have announced a "three-tier strategy" to cut 
off the Xcel Center. The steps include "blockading" streets and 
freeways, "immobilizing" delegates' trans****tation and "blocking" 
bridges to impede delegates' access to the center.
[The URLs for these groups are http://www.rncwelcomingcommittee.org/
and 
http://unconventionalaction.org/
-- though neither of them seem nearly 
as "ominous" to me as "Republican Party".--DC]

The plan also features a "swarm, seize, stay" strategy. After dividing 
the city into "sectors," protesters propose to "seize space" through 
both "hard technical blockades" and "softer, more mobile blockades" such 
as congestion, according to anarchist websites.
[Which Kersten unhelpfully fails to cite.--DC]

Some demonstrators may chain themselves together in public 
thoroughfares, while others operate in "waves" designed to "spread out 
police both geographically and tactically."

Last week, St. Paul city attorneys described these threats in do***ents 
filed in a federal lawsuit involving a permit for a march planned for 
Sept. 1, the convention's first day. Between 50,000 and 100,000 
demonstrators are expected to participate.

St. Paul officials have issued a permit that they say would allow 
protesters to march "within the very shadows of the glassed front" of 
the Xcel Center.
[Oh my Gawd!--DC]

But that's not enough for the Coalition to March on the RNC and Stop the 
War, an umbrella organization of protest groups. The coalition is 
demanding a route that would encircle the center. The city's proposed 
route, it maintains, would impermissibly interfere with protesters' 
ability to convey their message to delegates and the media, and so 
violates their First Amendment rights.

The groups that have threatened to shut down the convention are not on 
the front lines of the legal challenge. But the coalition and its 
lawyers just happen to be demanding the route that anarchists need to 
facilitate their plans.

Are the lawyers who are spearheading the coalition's suit a rag-tag 
bunch of former '60s radicals? Quite the opposite. The coalition boasts 
a legal armada that Exxon would envy. It includes pillars of the Twin 
Cities legal community -- the Minneapolis mega-firms of Leonard, Street 
and Deinard and Lindquist & Vennum -- as well as the ACLU of Minnesota 
and Bruce Nestor of the radical National Lawyers Guild.
[Exxon would envy this legal armada?--DC]

Todd Noteboom of Leonard, Street and Deinard says St. Paul has provided 
no evidence that radical groups' threats are serious or involve 
significant numbers. "The possibility that a small number of people 
might try to block a roadway or impede access to a bridge does not 
justify stripping 100,000 people of their First Amendment rights," he 
said on Tuesday.

The St. Paul Police Department doesn't have the luxury of such lawyerly 
armchair musing. It will have to confront the encirclement tactic on the 
city's streets. The city's court filings warn that consequences could 
include "violent confrontations" involving demonstrators, delegates and 
police.

Before the coalition's lawyers dismiss these concerns, they might want 
to check out some recent high-profile political events. At the 2004 GOP 
convention in New York City, for example, a massive and highly trained 
police force barely managed to avert chaos. At the 1999 WTO Summit in 
Seattle, a whirlwind of riots compelled the governor to call in the 
National Guard, and the mayor to declare a state of emergency that 
closed off the city's entire business district.
[These events notably featured police rioting and widescale violation of 
civil liberties. But that does not concern Kersten a bit.--DC]

Since 2000, cities that have hosted national Republican and Democratic 
party conventions have restricted protests in an effort to avoid 
Seattle-style disasters. According to an affidavit filed by St. Paul 
city attorneys, marches "within sight and sound of the primary 
convention venue" were not allowed at 2004 conventions in Boston or New 
York City "on any days of such conventions." In Boston in 2004, the only 
march allowed took place on a 20-foot sidewalk on the day before the 
convention, according to the city's court filings.

St. Paul is taking far fewer precautions than these other cities did. It 
is also bending over backward to facilitate free speech rights, and will 
set up a Public Viewing Area for protesters available between 7 a.m. and 
11 p.m. and directly across from the Xcel Center.
[Wow, a "Public Viewing Area" for protesters. Why not just put them in 
cages in the zoo?--DC]

In 2008, it's sadly inevitable that crazies will try to turn St. Paul 
streets into a war zone.

But we don't have to facilitate such intimidation. After the crazies 
move on, the establishment types who gave them comfort and cover -- and 
sued to win a march route that apparently facilitates their plans -- had 
better be prepared to take responsibility for what happens if they get 
their way.
[The standard rightist conception of collective punishment, penalizing 
individuals for actions that they had nothing to do with.--DC]

Katherine Kersten
mailto:kkersten@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Dan Clore

My collected fiction: _The Unspeakable and Others_
http://tinyurl.com/2gcoqt
Lord We˙rdgliffe & Necronomicon Page:
http://tinyurl.com/292yz9
News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo

Skipper: Professor, will you tell these people who is
in charge on this island?
Professor: Why, no one.
Skipper: No one?
Thurston Howell III: No one? Good heavens, this is anarchy!
-- _Gilligan's Island_, episode #6, "President Gilligan"
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Legal Challenge in Line w/ Plots to Disrupt GOP Convention (Anti
Dan Clore <clore@[EMAI  2008-06-25 21:24:40 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 0:45:39 CDT 2008.