websurf1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Postings with that level of immaturity give added weight to those who
> want to place said limits.
And they're generally fat and self-satisfied to begin with, so I guess
I should be more adult, to protect their health, lest they collapse
matter and become black holes; they are already gas giants.
> >So like the subject line says, does this mean that I can no longer post
> >that conservatives play the hairy sax and eat the notes, suck cock and
> >eat ***, or suchlike, without revealing my true name, Fred Trottelhauer
>
> The actions you attribute to "conservatives" are proven in court to be
> the actions
> of democrats, at least in the white house. You have it backwards.
Hole lotta screwin goin on in DC, I hear tell. wa****ngtonienne.com,
anyone ? It seems to be fully bipartisan. Then of course there's the
Bush I gogo-boy scandal, but we don't want to mention that. Wink Wink,
****ge ****ge, on the QT and all that. (During the Poppy administration,
it was found that 15-year old gay callboys were being given tours of
the White House late at night by an operative with connections to the
Oval Office.)
> I have no probelm with what people say. I hold them responsible for
> the truthfulness of the content, however, regardless of political label
> or persuasion.
Excellent. There's such a thing as Constitutionally protected speech,
under which category satire of public figures falls. So if I want to
say that Republicans suck cock and eat ***, I will, and it's legal to
boot. (And as I've demonstrated, it's also accurate, assuming that the
usual suspects wouldn't go out-of-party for a BJ and use a Democrat
underage callboy.)
Have an excellent and non-annoying day.
|
