Re: Urgent Memo To Leftists: If / When The USA Leaves Iraq, GENOCIDE

<roneal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:69b4c2d7-5cfd-4ef2-9625-1ebb8b879f1e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Apr 9, 12:32 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <hh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> <ron...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:f73ee17b-17d2-4bf4-9347-ff9da2a54b77@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 8, 1:52 pm, Clay <ClaysRi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > So says Paul Hughes - U.S. Institute of Peace -- Senior Program
> > Officer, Center for Post-Conflict Peace and Stability Operations.
>
> > Are leftists ready to shoulder the blame for the oncoming slaughter?
>
> > Do liberals have the courage to take responsibility for this certain
> > future bloodbath?
>
> > If history is any lesson...
>
> > -C-
> > Does Bush have the courage to take responsibility for a groundless
> > Iraqi war?
>
> > WMDs. Ties to al Qaida. "Imminent danger"
>
> >Read Bu****e boy's speech at the UN on Sept. 12, 2002:
>
> >http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912-1.html
>
> "The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of
threat
> Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to

> use
> them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam 
> and
> all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened
tomorrow."
>
> -Bill Clinton - 1998
>
> "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence re****ts show 
> that
> Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
> stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has 
> also
> given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda 
> members,
> though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the
terrible
> events of September 11, 2001."
>
> -Hillary Clinton - 2002
>
> http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12115-2004Oct6.html
>
> The Guardian - February 6, 1999
>
> "Saddam Hussein's regime has opened talks with Osama bin Laden, bringing
> closer the threat of a terrorist attack using chemical, biological or
> nuclear weapons, according to US intelligence sources and Iraqi
opposition
> officials."
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,314700,00.html-
Hide 
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well Eddie boy, notice that all the quotes you gave were prior to
March 2003 when Bu****e Baby initiated the Iraqi War.  By that point,
the intelligence sources had told Bush that the war was thinly
sup****ted by the then current evidence.  Books by Senator Robert
Graham, "Intelligence Matters" and another by Richard Clark, "Against
All Enemies" clearly state that Bush was advised that the Iraqi War
could not be justified.

Representative Dingel on "The Charlie Rose Show" plainly stated that
Bush refused to show Dingel the evidence sup****ting the war.

Repeat: No WMD.  No Ties to al-Qaida.  No conncection to 9-11 and bin
Laden.  No Yellow Cake.  No nuclear weapons program  No ICBM capable
of a 45 minute strike.  Etc. etc.  All had been dismantled by March
2003.

Wake up.

---------------------------------------

All had been dismantled before 98 when Clinton and the democrats said he
had 
them and bombed over it.

Wake up.

"The 1991 Persian Gulf War and subsequent U.N. inspections destroyed
Iraq's 
illicit weapons capability and, for the most part, Saddam Hussein did not 
try to rebuild it, according to an extensive re****t by the chief U.S. 
weapons inspector in Iraq that contradicts nearly every prewar assertion 
made by top administration officials about Iraq."

http://www.wa****ngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12115-2004Oct6.html

-Eddie Haskell