Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Conservatism > Black columnist...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 9173 of 10042
Post > Topic >>

Black columnist says "Cry me a river" to white victims of black

by =?KOI8-R?B?i45Hb3lmaXJlIFJhZGlvj4sgIldFLi4uYXJlIHRoZSBHb29kIEd1e Apr 14, 2008 at 11:12 AM

*A column about black-on-white crime written by Pulitzer Prize-winning
columnist and first-ever RadioScope editor Leonard Pitts Jr. has
rankled the white supremacist underground and led to serious threats
that are being investigated by the FBI.

      Days after his column "Oppressed Whites? Give Me A Break"
appeared in The   Miami Herald, white supremacist Web site
Overthrow.com posted his address, his home phone number and the name
of his wife. Similarly-themed Internet sites picked up the baton and
added directions to Pitts' house along with a satellite image of his
neighborhood.

      "Pitts has received dozens of hostile phone calls at his home
and about 400 e-mails," said Dave Wilson, The Miami Herald's managing
editor for news, in a Herald article. "An unsettling number of those
were threats."

      Pitts' June 3 column disagreed with a belief among white
supremacists that the recent murders of a white couple in Knoxville,
Tenn. reflected a surge in racially motivated violence by blacks
against whites and is not being re****ted by the "liberal media" as
much as white-on-black crime. The supremacists cite the Duke Lacrosse
case as an example.

      Although five blacks have been arrested for the Knoxville
murders, Pitts emphasized that the killings weren't being investigated
as a hate crime, and he rejected the groups' contention that black-on-
white crime is underre****ted. He also wrote that blacks and Hispanics
``are underrepresented in news media as victims of crime and
significantly overrepresented as perpetrators, based on crime
statistics.'

      Pitts, who won the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for commentary, closed by
offering four words to white Americans who feel victimized: "Cry me a
river."



http://curtmaynardsblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/critique-of-leonard-pitts-latest-lies.html

A Critique of Leonard Pitts' Latest LIES
Leonard Pitts' is doing his best to deceive you! He thinks he can
count on the power and influence of the mainstream media apparatus to
bury what he really wrote about the Channon Christian, Chris Newsom
murders that happened in Knoxville TN last January and the ever
growing number of White Americans that are becoming increasingly angry
over the mounting number of black on white crimes being committed in
the United States today.For a Pulitzer Prize winner Leonard Pitts
isn't very intelligent, nor is he the gifted wordsmith his sup****ters
would like you and me to believe he is, just look at his article, it
looks as if it were put together by an eighth grader.Pitts' is a dunce
and he's given himself away this time, in fact he's made it entirely
too easy. I'm going to show you the reader EXACTLY what Leonard Pitts'
wrote and then I'm going to show you EXACTLY how he's trying to bury
what he said and meant.Today, June 27, 2007, the Miami Herald
published this article by Leonard Pitts entitled "Neo-Nutsies bring
frustration, anger and - and joy.[1]" In the article Pitts' does his
absolute best to draw the reader's attention to the fact that some neo-
nazis have taken him to task for an article he wrote a few weeks ago
entitled "Oppressed Whites, Give Me a Break.[2]"

In the latter article Pitts clearly called whites [NOT just neo-nazis]
that are concerned about the growing numbers of black on white crimes
whiners and likely racists when he wrote "But still, one occasionally
hears mewling [means whining] noises from that subset of my white
countrymen who feel put upon by big, bad racial minorities. This is
one of those times. And Knoxville, Tenn., has become the capital city
of that lunatic fringe [In other words if you're concerned you're a
lunatic and likely a racist too].

In the same article Pitts clearly tells all whites, not just racist
whites that he couldn't give a damn about their concerns when he wrote
"I have four words for them [the racist whites] and any other white
Americans who feel themselves similarly victimized... Cry me a
river."Please note that our Puliutzer Prize winnner added the
inclusive "AND any other other whites who feel themselves similarly
victimized," which, if you're white, means you and me baby. Pitts'
doesn't care, in fact he'd only cry us a river, which is just another
way of saying screw you whitey.So anyway, on to Pitts' latest attempt
to deceive the American public. Today, June 27, 2007, our Pulitzer
Prize winner wrote in the aforementioned highly deceptive piece about
the Neo-Nutsies, that he'd been harrassed and threatened by a "self-
professed neo-Nazi leader whose name you won't read here." [Meaning
that Pitts isn't going to let YOU know who it was]. I suggest that the
real reason Pitts won't print his name, which is Bill White by the
way, is because Pitts' doesn't want YOU the reader to get a gander at
what he actually wrote in the initial column that irked White so much
in the first place.

Pitts doesn't want you the reader to do a google search on his name
and Channon Christian's name and see that there are thousands of
articles and chatroom discussions denouncing HIM for HIS blatant
racism, which is insurmountably worse than what he's allegedly been
subjected to by Bill White, because Bill White isn't a syndicated
columnist who words and ideas are read in newspapers from coast to
coast.

Pitts doesn't want you the reader to know that he doesn't believe the
Channon Christian, Chris Newsom murders were motivated by hate,
despite the fact that four blacks including a black female kidnapped,
tortured, gang raped, sodomized, and mutilated two young whites back
in January of this year in Knoxville TN. Nonetheless that's exactly
what he wrote and to make matters worse he now matter a factly states
that anyone believing otherwise, or anyone that doesn't see the crime
in exactly the same way he does is engaging in "an argument made for
ridiculing."[3]

Pitts' biggest lie and one easy to prove to anyone willing to take a
minute to examine his words is as follows. Pitts states in his latest
article Neo-Nutsies bring frustration, anger and - and joy that one of
the more 'asinine' of White's contentions was that he [Pitts] " told
those mourning the murders to "cry me a river.'' Pitts then insists
that this is innacurate by then stating "I gave that advice
specifically to white supremacists yelling genocide and other stupid
things," which is a complete and total LIE based on the mans own words
which were once again very inclusive "I have four words for them [the
racist whites] and any other white Americans who feel themselves
similarly victimized... Cry me a river." That's it, there it is, right
before your very eyes. Unlike Pitts' I'll provide the reader with
names and links to articles, I'm not afraid of the facts because I'm
not afraid of the truth, but I assure you that Leonard Pitts is. Pitts
is very concerned that he'll lose his job at the Miami Herald and his
syndicated column and he should be, because once his words hit the
mainstream he's finished. That is why I encourage anyone and everyone
reading this article to send it to your local newspaper with the
caveat that if they [your local paper] ever carry a Leonard Pitts
article again you'll drop your subscription. Send Leonard Pitts and
his bosses at the Miami Herald an email calling for his dismissal.
That's just what four hundred people did immediately after Pitts first
wrote the article Oppressed Whites, Give Me a Break only to be
referred to as racists for their efforts.

Ask yourself is the truth racist? Can the truth ever be racist?
According to Pitts and people like him it is. Pitts ends his latest
article with this:

"I feel a little like Jimmy Stewart in It's a Wonderful Life. They say
you can tell who a man is by looking at his friends. Which is true.
But I believe you can also tell by looking at his enemies. Apparently,
I have managed to make enemies of haters, bigots and other low,
pathetic men... I must be doing something right."

The above is further confirmation of the fact that Pitts' isn't in the
least bit sorry for what he wrote and in fact equates any dissenting
views as those coming alone from "haters, bigots and other low,
pathetic men." So, if you were in the least bit offended by what
Pitts' wrote chalk yourself up as a hater too. Your opinion as far as
his piece is of no im****tance whatsoever, because you're a bigot.In
conclusion I'd like to highlight another monstrous lie that Pitts'
attempts to foist upon his readers and that is, in his own words, that
black on white crime is "a relative statistical rarity."[4]

People, a Pulitzer Prize winner should be a whole lot more careful, or
at least a whole lot more cunning, when attempting to force a lie that
large down the readers throat. I can't imagine that more than 1 in 10
of his readers actually believes what he wrote, it's preposterous and
what's more, it's easily proven false. FBI and Department of Justice
statistics prove beyong a shadow of a doubt that black males between
the ages of 12 and 60 commit MORE than 50% of the murders in the
United States of America[5] and you can bet they are not just killing
black people.There are websites devoted to tracking black on white
crime, websites like newnation news[6] as just one example and
although perhaps politically incorrect to the extreme they only
do***ent factual cases of black on white crimes do***ented with
primary sources. If you visit that website you'll quickly see cases of
black on white crime that are too horrific to even imagine, but more
im****tantly what you'll quickly realize is that the vast majority of
these cases you've never heard of and that is because the mainstream
media has a vested interest, as does Leonard Pitts, in keeping you in
the dark, because if you were to find out exactly to what extent black
on white crime has become commonplace in America today you might get
angry and we couldn't have that in our multicultural paradise now
could we?

In any case, I have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in this article
that Leonard Pitts is a liar. I hope you'll take a few moments to
comment on this article here and to contact Pitts and the Miami Herald
in order to voice your outrage. If you're not outraged, I feel sorry
for you, because you have not only sold yourself down the river,
you've sold your family and friends down that river too, a river
created by the same tears of indifference that Pitts has for you and
"any other whites" that feel the same.

Leonard Pitts lpitts@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Miami Herald

DWilson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [Dave Wilson is Leonard Pitts' boss]

Here is a link to a petition calling for the firing of Leonard Pitts
HERE

Please note that the below Miami Herald articles have been
conveniently removed, but copies of his articles have been provided at
other sites.
[1] http://www.miamiherald.com/418/story/152502.html[2]
http://www.miamiherald.com/285/story/125806.html[3]
http://www.miamiherald.com/418/story/152502.html[4]
http://www.miamiherald.com/418/story/152502.html[5]
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm[6]
http://newnation.org/NNN-Black-on-White.html
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Black columnist says "Cry me a river" to white victims of black
=?KOI8-R?B?i45Hb3lmaXJlIF  2008-04-14 11:12:20 
Re: Black columnist says "Cry me a river" to white victims of bl
Benj <bjacoby@[EMAIL P  2008-04-14 12:15:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 10:50:57 CDT 2008.