Re: The Future of White America

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:41:10 +1000, Terryc
<newsthreespam-spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>Gunner Asch wrote:
>
>
>> Now about your attempt to divert away from the fact the residents of
>> Tenochtitlan were slave owning bloodthirsty savages to whom human
>> sacrifice in bulk was a way of life?
>
>Is this defined by a religion that had the Spanish Inquisition?

Defined?
Data points in this instance are "defined"?
>
>Or another academic paper by academics that argued that El dorado was a 
>myth and that the Amazon Basin could never have sup****ted millions of 
>people?


"[L]iberals are afraid to state what they truly believe in, for to do so 
would result in even less votes than they currently receive. Their 
methodology is to lie about their real agenda in the hopes of regaining 
power, at which point they will do whatever they damn well please. The 
problem is they have concealed and obfuscated for so long that, as a
group, 
they themselves are no longer sure of their goals. They are a collection
of 
wild-eyed splinter groups, all holding a grab-bag of dreams and wishes.
Some 
want a Socialist, secular-humanist state, others the repeal of the Second 
Amendment. Some want same ***/different species marriage, others want
voting 
rights for trees, fish, coal and bugs. Some want cradle to grave care and 
complete subservience to the government nanny state, others want a culture

that walks in lockstep and speaks only with intonations of political 
correctness. I view the American liberals in much the same way I view the 
competing factions of Islamic
fundamentalists. The latter hate each other to the core, and only join 
forces to attack the US or Israel. The former hate themselves to the core,

and only join forces to attack George Bush and conservatives." --Ron Marr