Re: Samuelson on OIl Drilling

On May 1, 10:02 am, forbisga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On May 1, 6:20 am, Geo <taxpayer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 1, 9:16 am, forbisga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > > On May 1, 5:43 am, Geo <taxpayer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 1, 8:24 am, forbisga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 1, 4:24 am, Geo <taxpayer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Apr 30, 9:15 pm, "Sid9" <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Larry Hewitt" <larryh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > > > > >news:fvb42b$f63$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > > "Geo" <taxpayer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > > > > >
>news:e1dd1f69-8a85-4a22-94b1-f6f74e045adb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > >> On Apr 30, 4:16 pm, "Sid9" <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>> "Larry Hewitt" <larryh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
>
> > > > > > > >>>news:fvajnd$un3$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > >>> > "John Galt" <whoisjohng...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
> > > > > > > >>>
>news:UtXRj.117452$6i4.58782@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > >>> >> <vjp2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
> > > > > > > >>> >>news:fv9eie$rsa$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > >>> >>> It's in our interest to use up everybody else's oil
before our own.
>
> > > > > > > >>> >> It's not in our best interest to lower our standard
of living in the
> > > > > > > >>> >> process, which is what the result will be.
>
> > > > > > > >>> > It is, in fact, very easy to _raise_ our standards of
living while
> > > > > > > >>> > reducing oil consumption.
>
> > > > > > > >>> > For example, as much as 5% of domestic electric
consummption is the
> > > > > > > >>> > result
> > > > > > > >>> > of instant on fetures in consumer electronics or
consumer electronics
> > > > > > > >>> > that
> > > > > > > >>> > are always on (cable modem are surprisingly greedy).
>
> > > > > > > >>> > Using existing technology to change this as new
electronics are
> > > > > > > >>> > purchased
> > > > > > > >>> > would save the average family $12 a month. And at the
same time it
> > > > > > > >>> > would
> > > > > > > >>> > eliminate the need for 2 or 3 large electric
generating plants. Or the
> > > > > > > >>> > freed up power could be used to run 200,000 all
electric cars.
>
> > > > > > > >>> > Larry
>
> > > > > > > >>> >> JG
>
> > > > > > > >>> >>>     - = -
> > > > > > > >>> >>> Vasos Panagiotopoulos, Columbia'81+, Reagan, Mozart,
Pindus,
> > > > > > > >>> >>> BioStrategist
> > > > > > > >>> >>>   
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/vjp2/vasos.htm
> > > > > > > >>> >>>  ---{Nothing herein constitutes advice.  Everything
fully
> > > > > > > >>> >>> disclaimed.}---
> > > > > > > >>> >>>   [Homeland Security means private firearms not lazy
obstructive
> > > > > > > >>> >>> guards]
> > > > > > > >>> >>> [Urb sprawl confounds terror] [Remorse begets zeal]
[Windows is for
> > > > > > > >>> >>> Bimbos]
>
> > > > > > > >>> Replace every incandescent lamp with a CFL.....how much
will that save?
>
> > > > > > > >>> Solar heat domestic hot war in our southern states...how
much will that
> > > > > > > >>> save?
>
> > > > > > > >>> Restore the pre-Reagan energy saving rules...how much
will that save?
>
> > > > > > > >>> I'm sure there's a lot more that can be done on the
conservation side
> > > > > > > >>> without reducing our quality of life.
>
> > > > > > > >>> We only need the leadership...we surely do not have it
in the
> > > > > > > >>> Republicans.
>
> > > > > > > >> You know something, if you want to use a CFL, solar heat,
or any other
> > > > > > > >> conservation method go right ahead and do it.  Why on
earth, in a free
> > > > > > > >> society, do you need the govt telling you what kind of
lightbulb you
> > > > > > > >> need?  Really, is there no end to what you think govt
should be doing
> > > > > > > >> for you?
>
> > > > > > > > Ah, that ole libertarian crap.
>
> > > > > > > > I wanna do what I wanna do and noone can stop me.
>
> > > > > > > > No matter what damage I do to the property of others, what
rights of
> > > > > > > > others I trample.
>
> > > > > > > > Everyone else should just shut up and let me do my  thing.
>
> > > > > > > > Yet when others try  this you whine and piss your pants.
>
> > > > > > > > Larry
>
> > > > > > > They hang the label "Libertarian" on themselves...actually
they are
> > > > > > > anarchists
>
> > > > > > Sid, you've become so conditioned and accepting of big govt
and its
> > > > > > intrusion into every aspect of your life that anything
resembling
> > > > > > personal responsibility or accountability would look like
anarchy to
> > > > > > you.
>
> > > > > Would you agree with the following:
> > > > >   You don't want people intruding into certain aspects of your
life.
> > > > >   You believe you would have a better standard of living if
others
> > > > >      did not intrude into certain aspects of your life.
> > > > >   You have certain rights that are not negotiable and others
must
> > > > >      respect.
> > > > >   If others do not respect your rights then they will suffer the
> > > > >      consequences of your retributive actions.
>
> > > > What I agree with is that all individuals have the right to
exercise
> > > > sole dominion over their own lives, and have the right to live in
> > > > whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly
interfere
> > > > with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they
> > > > choose.  In other words, do as you wish as long as it does not
> > > > encroach on someone else's rights, property, or freedoms through
force
> > > > or fraud.
>
> > > That's only partially responsive.  The issue I raise is related to
> > > when one feels one's rights, property, or freedoms have been
violated
> > > through force or fraud.  Things happen.  I'm asking you to commit
> > > yourself to what is allowable under such conditions.
>
> > What part of do as you wish as long as it does not encroach on someone
> > else's rights, property, or freedoms through force or fraud aren't you
> > understanding?
>
> The part dealing with the case where it happens.  What rights and
> freedoms do I have when I feel my rights, property, or freedoms have
> been violated by others through force or fraud?  May I use force
> in return or is this precluded by your philosophy?

One would use the laws available to them.