Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Australian China Culture > Re: §§ THE REAL...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 4 Topic 195 of 239
Post > Topic >>

Re: §§ THE REAL CAUSE OF WAR SINCE A 1000 YEARS !!!

by "Kevin" <Kevin@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 20, 2007 at 09:58 AM

Some more detail on French involvement wars.



We are still accepting submissions from history researchers.
Last update: May 4, 2005.

  - Gallic Wars
  - Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French 
history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian. [Or at ths time

in history, a Roman -ed.]

  - Hundred Years War
  - Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently 
creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious 
only when not led by a Frenchman." Sainted.

  - Italian Wars
  - Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars 
when fighting Italians.

  - Wars of Religion
  - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots

  - Thirty Years War
  - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded 
anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants 
started ignoring her.

  - War of Revolution
  - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.

  - The Dutch War
  - Tied

  - War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War
  - Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded 
Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French 
military power.

  - War of the Spanish Succession
  - Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough,

which they have loved every since.

  - American Revolution
  - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France 
claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This
is 
later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of
French 
Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."

  - French Revolution
  - Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.

  - The Napoleonic Wars
  - Lost. Tem****ary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leader****p

of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear
designer.

  - The Franco-Prussian War
  - Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly 
girl home alone on a Saturday night.

  - World War I
  - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States 
[Entering the war late -ed.]. Thousands of French women find out what it's

like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her 
"Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls

any improvement in the French bloodline.

  - World War II
  - Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just

as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.

  - War in Indochina
  - Lost. French forces plead sickness; take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu

  - Algerian Rebellion
  - Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic 
Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim 
Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the 
First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, 
Vietnamese and Esquimaux.

  - War on Terrorism
  - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and 
Muslims just to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese ambassador
fail 
after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.

  The question for any country silly enough to count on the French should 
not be "Can we count on the French?", but rather "How long until France 
collapses?"

  "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an 
accordion. All you do is leave behind a lot of noisy baggage."

  Or, better still, the quote from last week's Wall Street Journal:
"They're 
there when they need you."



With only an hour and a half of research, Jonathan Duczkowski provided the

following losses:

  Norse invasions, 841-911.
  After having their way with the French for 70 years, the Norse are
bribed 
by a French King named Charles the Simple (really!) who gave them Normandy

in return for peace. Normans proceed to become just about the only
positive 
military bonus in France's [favour] for next 500 years.

    Andrew Ouellette posts this in response:

    1066 A.D. William The Conquerer Duke and Ruler of France Launches the 
Largest Invasion in the history of the world no other was as large until
the 
same trip was taken in reverse on June 6th 1944 William Fights Harold for 
the Throne of England Which old king Edward rightfully left to William but

Harold Usurped the throne Will fights the Saxons (English)wins and the 
French Rule England for the Next 80 Years. then the French start the
largest 
building and economic infrastructure since the fall of the Roman Empire
the 
Norman Economy skyrockets and the Normans inadvertantly start England to 
become a major world Power Vive La France-

    Matt Davis posts this in response to Andrew Ouellette above:

    Oh dear. We seem to have overlooked some basic facts. Firstly, Philip 
the First (1060 - 1108) was King of France at the time of the Norman 
invasion of 1066 - William was Duke of Normandy and, incidentally,
directly 
descended from the Vikings. William was, therefore, as alien to France as 
the experience of victory. Since Philip did not invade England, the
victory 
at Hastings was Norman - not French. Normandy may be a part of France now 
but it most certainly wasn't in 1066. Therefore, William's coronation as 
King of England had nothing whatsoever to do with the French. As usual,
they 
were nowhere near the place when the fighting was going on. The mistaken 
belief that 1066 was a French victory leads to the Third Rule of French 
Warfare; "When incapable of any victory whatsoever - claim someone
else's".

  Mexico, 1863-1864.
  France attempts to take advantage of Mexico's weakness following its 
thorough thra****ng by the U.S. 20 years earlier ("Halls of Montezuma").
Not 
surprisingly, the only unit to distinguish itself is the French Foreign 
Legion (consisting of, by definition, non-Frenchmen). Booted out of the 
country a little over a year after arrival.

  Panama jungles 1881-1890.
  No one but nature to fight, France still loses; canal is eventually
built 
by the U.S. 1904-1914.

  Napoleonic Wars.
  Should be noted that the Grand Armee was largely (~%50) composed of 
non-Frenchmen after 1804 or so. Mainly disgruntled minorities and 
anti-monarchists. Not surprisingly, these performed better than the French

on many occasions.

  Haiti, 1791-1804.
  French defeated by rebellion after sacrificing 4,000 Poles to yellow 
fever. Shows another rule of French warfare; when in doubt, send an ally.

  India, 1673-1813.
  British were far more charming than French, ended up victors. Therefore 
the British are well known for their tea, and the French for their whine 
(er, wine...). Ensures 200 years of bad teeth in England.

  Barbary Wars, middle ages-1830.
  Pirates in North Africa continually harass European ****pping in 
Meditteranean. France's solution: pay them to leave us alone. America's 
solution: kick their ***** ("the Shores of Tripoli"). [America's] first 
overseas victories, won 1801-1815.

  1798-1801, Quasi-War with U.S.
  French privateers (semi-legal pirates) attack U.S. ****pping. U.S. fights

France at sea for 3 years; French eventually cave; sets precedent for next

200 years of Franco-American relations.

  Moors in Spain, late 700s-early 800s.
  Even with Charlemagne leading them against an enemy living in a hostile 
land, French are unable to make much progress. Hide behind Pyrennes until 
the modern day.

  French-on-French losses (probably should be counted as victories too,
just 
to be fair):

  1208: Albigenses Crusade, French massacared by French.
  When asked how to differentiate a heretic from the faithful, response
was 
"Kill them all. God will know His own." Lesson: French are bad***** when 
fighting unarmed men, women and children.

  St. Bartholomew Day Massacre, August 24, 1572.
  Once again, French-on-French slaughter.

  Third Crusade.
  Philip Augustus of France throws hissy-fit, leaves Crusade for Richard
the 
Lion Heart to finish.

  Seventh Crusade.
  St. Louis of France leads Crusade to Egypt. Resoundingly crushed.

  [Eighth] Crusade.
  St. Louis back in action, this time in Tunis. See Seventh Crusade.

  Also should be noted that France attempted to hide behind the Maginot 
line, sticking their head in the sand and pretending that the Germans
would 
enter France that way. By doing so, the Germans would have been breaking 
with their traditional route of invading France, entering through Belgium 
(Napoleonic Wars, Franco-Prussian War, World War I, etc.). French ignored 
this though, and put all their effort into these defenses.

Thomas Whiteley has submitted this addition to me:

  Seven year War 1756-1763
  Lost: after getting hammered by Frederick the Great of Prussia (yep, the

Germans again) at Rossbach, the French were held off for the remainder of 
the War by Frederick of Brunswick and a hodge-podge army including some 
Brits. War also saw France kicked out of Canada (Wolfe at Quebec) and
India 
(Clive at Plassey).

Richard Mann, an American in France wants to add the following:

  The French consider the departure of the French from Algeria in 1962-63,

after 130 years on colonialism, as a French victory and especially
consider 
C. de Gaulle as a hero for 'leading' said victory over the unwilling
French 
public who were very much against the departure. This ended their 
colonialism. About 2 million ungrateful Algerians lost their lives in this

shoddy affair.
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Re: §§ THE REAL CAUSE OF WAR SINCE A 1000 YEARS !!!
"Kevin" <Kev  2007-05-20 09:52:56 
Re: §§ THE REAL CAUSE OF WAR SINCE A 1000 YEARS !!!
"Kevin" <Kev  2007-05-20 09:58:26 
Re: §§ THE REAL CAUSE OF WAR SINCE A 1000 YEARS !!!
"Chairman Mao says:&  2007-05-20 12:26:22 
Re: §§ THE REAL CAUSE OF WAR SINCE A 1000 YEARS !!!
"Chairman Mao says:&  2007-05-20 12:25:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 8:10:00 CDT 2008.