Sandro wrote:
> On Mar 3, 9:54 am, imorf <imorf_removet...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> I guess that could be why you write reviews. To compensate on several
>> levels for seeing films, namely sup****ting an industry where 9 out of
10
>> creations are abortions from the start.
>
> In a roundabout way, I think you're calling me a whore. But not even a
> whore with the brains to get paid for his/her services.
no. The woman that does those Brand something or other supermarket
commercials is a whore. Bert Newton is a whore. The Channel Nine cricket
commentary team is a whore. You are not a whore. I wouldn't call you it,
but perhaps you should be saying you think I'm calling you a ****.
> I'm not
> sup****ting an industry by reviewing films. I'm sup****ting the notion
> that I can write reviews just for the **** of it and without the
> justification of getting paid for it.
they're not mutually exclusive, but you don't have to justify your
actions.
> As for why that should be the
> case, well, it beats sending out spam about huge teenage breasts and
> the like for entertainment value, at least for my money or lack
> thereof.
> Sandro
> --
> http://movie-reviews.com.au
o i c. There is a reason.
"There Will Be Moustaches"
I lol'd.
|
