Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Australian Gothic Culture > movie review: G...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1055 of 1071
Post > Topic >>

movie review: Gone Baby Gone

by Sandro <ceinwine@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 7, 2008 at 06:15 AM

dir: Ben Affleck

2007

To me, and I suspect a lot of other audience members, the concept of a
film directed by Ben Affleck starring Casey Affleck seems like one of
those perfect storm conditions for a Shit Storm of the Century-type of
outcomes.

And setting it in Boston amongst working class, criminal and trashy
Southies? That's like a tornado inside a hurricane inside a campaign
of sustained aerial bombardment hitting your trailer park.

The suburb of Dorchester, which is both the setting for the film and
where the book's author Dennis Lehane was birthed and grown, looks
like the trashiest, grungiest shithole in America. Whatever initial
claim it might have had to being the Irish heart of old Boston is long
gone. It looks like the kind of place that not only houses the highest
levels per capita of Jerry Springer viewers, but also the greatest
amount of participants in the show.

Helene McCready (Amy Ryan) is just another one of these Southie
scumbags, who manages to be repellent and compelling at the same time.
She's one of those alcoholic drug addicts who would probably start a
lot of sentences with the phrase "Now I'm never going to win a 'Mother
of the Year' award, but..." and then proves it with her behaviour on a
continual basis.

None of this really matters except for the fact that Helene's little
daughter Amanda (Madeleine O'Brien) has gone missing. The daughter
she's been horribly neglecting seems to have been kidnapped, and,
according to the police, it doesn't look good for her chances of being
found alive.

The police are all over the case, with press conferences and lots of
people milling around on the street outside the McCready hovel, but
Amanda's auntie (Amy Madigan) decides to bring in some outside help.
Because she, at least, really loves the child, as does her uncle
Lionel (Titus Welliver).

When she hires private investigator Patrick Kenzie (Casey Affleck),
it's with the understanding that Patrick has connections amongst
Boston's scumbags and criminal underworld not available to the police.
Patrick, who looks too young for his age, and who has an even tougher
female partner Angela (Michelle Monaghan), overcompensates by being
smarter and more prone to violence than you think such a chap should.

In trying to find Amanda, Patrick follows strange leads even when
given access to police information that you think he would ordinarily
not have access to. And you'd be right, because there are nefarious
doings afoot simultaneously, because in the tradition of any detective
story, contemporary or ancient, the PI can't know what's going on
until the audience does.

At first they investigate the lies of Mother of the Year, who claimed
initially that she was gone from the house when the daughter went
missing for only a brief amount of time, and only in order to get a
snifter of peach schnapps on the way back from choir practice. This
leads Patrick and Angela to one of the first of many confrontations
with the salt of the earth of Dorchester. A tense scene in Helene's
local bar establishes Patrick's bona fides as a guy substantially
tougher than he looks.

For my money, it was this scene that sold the flick. Not the thugs
acting like thugs and Patrick having to operate on their level, nor
what seems like the easy resolution of the scene thanks to the timely
intervention of a gun. The reason it worked and allowed me to enjoy
the rest of the film, and to be surprised by it, is because Casey
Affleck manages to make the scene and the character very believable.

It's important because there are crucial scenes that follow where
Patrick's dancing on the razor-thin line between justice, whether
legal or natural, and outright criminality. He faces, over the course
of the story, two impossibly difficult situations where he has to make
us believe the moral and emotional turmoil that he faces, because the
choices are of catastrophic importance.

The plot seems to be going in one direction: that Amanda was kidnapped
and is being held for ransom over drug money. In the ensuing
confusion, Amanda is declared dead and everyone is supposed to move
along, nothing to see here.

But Patrick remembers and notices the discrepancies in people's
stories. Something is decidedly not right about the scenario, seeing
as it involves the curious complicity of various people and an
aggressive police detective, Remy Bressant (Ed Harris in a wicked
hairpiece), who seems comfortable with breaking the law in order to
get a better result.

He repeats a few times about how much he loves kids. If that doesn't
strike fear into the hearts of audience members and parents worldwide,
I don't know what does short of the fact that Michael Jackson is a
parent.

In following what seemed like an unrelated lead, Patrick enters a
horror house of abuse and murder which tangentially reveals that
almost everything he believed about Amanda's case is wrong. It also
leads to him making the decision to do the absolute Wrong thing for
the Right reasons.

He is applauded and lauded for it, by the cops and by his partner, but
he knows deep down that what he does is wrong. As events further
transpire, before the end Patrick is forced to choose between doing
the Right thing for the Wrong reasons, or the opposite yet again. And
it's a choice with devastating consequences.

I was quite surprised at how much I enjoyed this flick. The previous
flick based on a Lehane book, directed into a 'prestige' Oscarbait
potboiler being Mystic River left me very cold. Where others saw a
tremendous collection of powerful acting and difficult subject matter,
I saw a heap of overacted tripe left out in the Boston sun too long.
This one has the moral murkiness and complexity that I can appreciate
and understand.

It's easy to hate Ben Affleck, predominately because he's Ben Affleck.
But he really does a decent job capturing not the milieu or the
culture of these people, who really don't strike me as that different
from the rest of working class or marginalised America except for that
accent, but really does honour the story to raise it up to be
something more than just your usual mystery / police procedural.

Casey Affleck especially continues to impress, both with his work here
and in another flick that came out last year, The Assassination of
Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. He is starting to shed the
perception that he's just a younger, dumber version of his older
brother, or that he's just a comic relief lightweight. He made me
believe this character's turmoil and his criminal's sense of justice
and morality. He, like almost every character in the flick except for
mother Helene and the perverted denizens of the horror house, thinks
he's doing the best thing for the child whenever he makes his
decision. But the film never lets him or anyone else off the hook for
their decisions.

Everyone claims to do everything they do for the children, their own
or the nebulous, abstract idea of this untapped and innocent resource
lurking just outside of vision. Won't someone please think of the
children etc. The problem is, especially in the case of the state and
law enforcement's role in protecting children, the decisions hardly
ever are cut and dry.

Australia still has lingering problems with decisions made many
decades ago when it was deemed in the best interests of Aboriginal
children to be taken away from their parents and given to other
families or to workhouses masquerading as orphanages and boarding
schools. The legacy of those decisions, and that arrogant position by
which someone chooses what fate best befits another person's children,
has repercussions for centuries.

On the smaller scale, in the case of negligent parents, is the
decision to make a child a ward of the state or to take them away from
a fuckup mother ever an easy one? Can you know in advance what a
child's fate will be, comparing the two paths with the nexus being
whether they're taken away from one and given to another or not?

Gone Baby Gone doesn't prepare to have the answers, nor does it
pretend that there are clear identifiers to indicate what could be the
best courses of action, or what the ultimate virtue of moral
relativism is. It has a lot of characters who believe they are doing
the right thing by a child, but who do great evil instead. And in the
final simple, poignant frame, we wonder whether the final crucial
decision Patrick made was the right one.

It takes a bold flick to follow a path from which closure and a clear
destination point aren't articulated. It takes a good one to make it
work, which this one does.

Colour me impressed, against all my wishes and intentions. It's a
solid film with an ending that leaves you feeling vaguely dirty and
somewhat guilty, just like the best sexual experiences do.

8 times "It was an accident" said by such a scumbag character could
prompt me to similar levels of divine retribution out of 10

--
"Now, I can't think of one reason big enough for him to lie about
that's small enough not to matter." - Gone Baby Gone.




 1 Posts in Topic:
movie review: Gone Baby Gone
Sandro <ceinwine@[EMAI  2008-04-07 06:15:49 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat May 17 1:41:41 CDT 2008.