Re: **** child magazine under classification review

Anna wrote:
> It is interesting how the Australian News Covered up the photo whereas
> one can still get it on the Art Monthly web site.
> 
> Just for the record while I don't think this is **** it does concern
> me how pedos could use such photos.

Or photographs of children in catalogs?

Much as you may dislike the idea of a pedo salivating over a picture of 
a child, the child comes to no harm as a result.

Sylvia.