Re: **** child magazine under classification review

On Jul 14, 5:15 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Anna wrote:
> > It is interesting how the Australian News Covered up the photo whereas
> > one can still get it on the Art Monthly web site.
>
> > Just for the record while I don't think this is **** it does concern
> > me how pedos could use such photos.
>
> Or photographs of children in catalogs?
>
> Much as you may dislike the idea of a pedo salivating over a picture of
> a child, the child comes to no harm as a result.
>
> Sylvia.

By the way Sylvia, I watched "Sea Patrol" and it sucks. I seem to
enjoy it though for the laugh.

My favourite episode is where they were chased away by a fi****ng boat
using only polls and flairs.

And what's up with never shooting a ****p? I mean they tell the ****p to
stop, sometimes even fire warning shots but after that, it's like oh,
well we tried, and they let the ****p escape.