Re: **** child magazine under classification review

Anna wrote:
> On Jul 14, 5:15 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Anna wrote:
>>> It is interesting how the Australian News Covered up the photo whereas
>>> one can still get it on the Art Monthly web site.
>>> Just for the record while I don't think this is **** it does concern
>>> me how pedos could use such photos.
>> Or photographs of children in catalogs?
>>
>> Much as you may dislike the idea of a pedo salivating over a picture of
>> a child, the child comes to no harm as a result.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> 
> By the way Sylvia, I watched "Sea Patrol" and it sucks. I seem to
> enjoy it though for the laugh.
> 
> My favourite episode is where they were chased away by a fi****ng boat
> using only polls and flairs.
> 
> And what's up with never shooting a ****p? I mean they tell the ****p to
> stop, sometimes even fire warning shots but after that, it's like oh,
> well we tried, and they let the ****p escape.

There's been criticism of the show in aus.tv on similar grounds. The 
worrying thing is that, in these politically correct times, it might 
actually be true that crims can tangle with the Australian navy, and 
come off best. I can only hope that it's not. Either way, as a 
recruiting tool (which is why access to the ****ps is provided) it leaves 
much to be desired.

Sylvia.