Re: **** child magazine under classification review

On Jul 14, 5:15 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Anna wrote:
> > It is interesting how the Australian News Covered up the photo whereas
> > one can still get it on the Art Monthly web site.
>
> > Just for the record while I don't think this is **** it does concern
> > me how pedos could use such photos.
>
> Or photographs of children in catalogs?
>
> Much as you may dislike the idea of a pedo salivating over a picture of
> a child, the child comes to no harm as a result.
>
> Sylvia.

You are right, especially given the lifestyle that Olympia will
probably live due to her upbringing, I don't believe the photos are
going to harm her one bit. In fact I can see how it could have been an
enjoyable and enriching experience for her.

So, if there was no harm done to Olympia, and in fact she enjoyed it,
what's the problem? This is the question that is raised when one talks
of stuff like this.

Well I believe the harm is to other children who might be abused by
pedophiles seeing such photos.