Re: **** child magazine under classification review

Well said, Mike.  :-)


"s****tbug" <MikeNCalifornia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:24a18e85-9b85-4d3d-9a3d-34793180b52d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Jul 14, 12:23 pm, Anna <annalidd...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> It is interesting how the Australian News Covered up the photo whereas
> one can still get it on the Art Monthly web site.
>
> Just for the record while I don't think this is **** it does concern
> me how pedos could use such photos.

I do not give a "****" what a pedos does, and yes, I do care..    What
really matters is "what" we do with pedos.   Not the innocently
pictures which the child approves to engage in with parents
permission.   The picture is harmless, if you yourself anna, got a
brain.   I like to look at things without all the bull****s,
propaganda coming from you, etc.   The picture of a ****d child in
artistic form is a beautiful picture.   I do not need to rape a
child.   I am not ***ual arroused either.   What the pedo does their
problem, and pedos should be held accoutable for their own actions.
Not the ones innocently posed in pictures.....the pictures not evil...