Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Australian Naturist > Re: **** child ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 36 of 44 Topic 878 of 939
Post > Topic >>

Re: **** child magazine under classification review

by Anna <annaliddell@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 15, 2008 at 07:28 PM

Anna wrote:
> It is interesting how the Australian News Covered up the photo whereas
> one can still get it on the Art Monthly web site.
>
> Just for the record while I don't think this is **** it does concern
> me how pedos could use such photos.
>
> http://www.artmonthly.org.au
>
> http://www.classification.gov.au/special.html
>
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/07/10/2299446.htm
>
> The Australian Classification Board will review an art magazine that
> featured **** photographs of a six-year-old girl on its cover.
>
> Art Monthly's controversial cover comes in the wake of intense public
> debate over artist Bill Henson's photographs of a ****d teenage girl
> which were confiscated from a Sydney gallery.
>
> The girl featured in the magazine, Olympia Nelson, is now 11 and says
> she is proud of the photos.
>
> The New South Wales Government referred Art Monthly to the federal
> board earlier this week.
>
> The editor of Art Monthly, Maurice O'Rierdon, says the board has the
> power to restrict publication or ban the issue.
>
> "As it stands now, part of the process ... means the publication isn't
> allowed to be sold, so until a classification is given any retailer or
> even ourselves can't sell the magazine," he said.
>
> Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has criticised the use of the photos and
> Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson has threatened to take up the matter
> with the Australian Federal Police.
>
> Art Monthly is partly funded by the Federal and ACT Governments.
>
> The Federal Government will ask its peak arts funding body to develop
> a set of protocols to be used when dealing with images of children.


http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/waikatotimes/4620353a6004.html

A controversial Australian photographer at the centre of a media storm
across the Tasman over a **** photo of her young daughter will be a
guest speaker at Wintec's Spark Festival next month.

Photographer Polixeni Papapetrou drew criticism from Australian Prime
Minister Kevin Rudd over the picture, which appeared on the cover of
an arts magazine.

The photo was taken when Ms Papapetrou's daughter, Olympia, 11, was
six years old and was heavily criticised as a form of child
exploitation, but backed in some quarters as artistic expression.

Wintec School of Media Arts head Margi Moore said one of the functions
of the Spark Festival was to provide a forum for debate on such
matters.

She said she was delighted to have Ms Papapetrou as a guest speaker at
the festival and expected "informed and intelligent debate".

Spark co-ordinator Susanna Wilford said the festival offered a context
for robust debates on a variety of artistic issues.

Ms Papapetrou would talk about the ideas behind her work and some of
the issues surrounding photographing children.

The photographer would be one of several guest speakers and would be
speaking on August 5 at The Hub at Wintec's city campus.

Spark 08 is the 10th birthday of the arts/media/design festival in
Hamilton. This year's festival will run from August 4 to 8.
 




 44 Posts in Topic:
Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-14 12:23:59 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-07-15 10:15:54 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-07-14 20:52:50 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-07-15 12:11:03 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-14 19:32:36 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-14 19:33:28 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-07-15 13:35:11 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-14 19:49:55 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-14 19:54:56 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-14 20:01:00 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-14 20:06:21 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-07-15 13:26:46 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-14 20:06:44 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
sportbug <MikeNCalifor  2008-07-14 20:27:47 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-07-15 12:43:18 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
"Neosapienis" &  2008-07-16 02:25:17 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-07-16 00:06:12 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
sportbug <MikeNCalifor  2008-07-14 20:31:02 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-07-15 13:32:20 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
"Terry J. Wood"  2008-07-15 12:51:57 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 08:10:53 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 08:14:23 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-07-16 09:38:15 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 08:29:57 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 08:46:52 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 09:00:21 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-15 16:49:29 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
"Neosapienis" &  2008-07-16 02:28:18 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 19:01:01 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 19:01:38 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-07-16 12:10:44 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 19:05:56 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-15 19:18:44 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 19:26:00 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Sylvia Else <sylvia@[E  2008-07-16 12:41:33 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-15 19:28:23 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Zee <jonZeee@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-15 23:35:50 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
tvstations77@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-16 06:16:40 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
tvstations77@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-07-16 06:35:33 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
"Neosapienis" &  2008-07-17 21:18:52 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Anna <annaliddell@[EMA  2008-07-16 07:14:46 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
"Neosapienis" &  2008-07-17 21:17:08 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
"David Looser"   2008-07-18 21:30:43 
Re: Nude child magazine under classification review
Dan MacKay <cal1free@[  2008-07-18 16:16:12 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 1:51:48 CDT 2008.