Dinsdale Pirana wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:54:21 -0700 (PDT), anonymum
> <anonymums@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in aus.culture.true-blue:
>
>> For the fathers lobby groups, its not enough - It will never be
>> enough. Why? Because they were never after shared care, they want far
>> more than that and they wont stop until mothers and childrens rights
>> are abolished.
>>
>> Out of the ashes of destruction and devastation, we give birth to
>> Anonymums.
>>
>
> What a load of rubbish!
>
> The whole Child Sup****t system is geared against men. I was a
> custodial parent one of the 5% of such men and was treated like ****.
I agree with you completely on the gearing, the courts are so geared
against blokes in cases like this it's not funny, and there is very good
reason for a father's lobby group to try to equalise this out (you can
blame the churchies for this mess), but the "fathers lobby group" that
posts in these forums are a pack of lunatics, I'd hate to see any child
put in any of their hands as they do mad **** like trying to justify why
a cowardly **** of a bloke would kill his own children, blaming women
for their own dickless pathetic cowardice.
People like that are the worst form of enemy of people like yourself
that are presumably good fathers just after a fair goal that is
currently totally absent from our family court system.
|
