On Apr 30, 9:03=A0am, concerned <bebuy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 7:36=A0am, "By-Proxy" <p...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > concerned <bebuy...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
innews:a4df2614-732d-488c-8fb1-a399=
9f3a42a3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > On Apr 27, 5:38=A0pm, Hunter01 <hunte...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> concerned wrote:
> > >> > On Apr 27, 11:22 am, Hunter01 <hunte...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> >> So you consider the Aboriginal race to be above the laws of the
> > >> >> land that the rest of Australia are subjected to??? You bloody
> > >> >> racist you. Sorry, but nothing's going to change when you got a
> > >> >> mob of wankers saying "we want to be treated differently",
> > >> >> everyone needs to say "the laws need to change for all". The
> > >> >> Australian Nazi Party (the group you are referring to) need to
> > >> >> remember they're just other Australians like the rest of us.-
Hide=
> > >> >> quoted text -
>
> > >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > >> > Hunter, I am only expressing the facts, It is a fact that the
> > >> > Victorian Government has no proper legislated power to make Laws
> > >> > for the Aboriginal race of Victoria,
>
> > >> That is not true though, is it. That may be an opinion that the
> > >> tinfoil hate brigade subscribe too. Unfortunately for them, the
> > >> industry trying to cash in on this false belief and the racists
that
> > >> are attempting to keep Aboriginals and everyone else seperate,
=A0it
> > >> just ain't true.
>
> > >> > I have previously directed you an
> > >> > ongoing court case where Jurisdiction of the parliament and the
> > >> > Courts are open to debate, (http://bebuybac.blogspot.com)
The
Group=
> > >> > I referred to is far removed from The Australian Nazi Party as
you
> > >> > suggested, and whose members are not interested in the future
well
> > >> > fare or well being of the people of Australia, Yes a fact!
>
> > >> The only road forward for Australia as a whole is for Australia to
be=
> > >> whole. That does not include facilitating uber-races and a
modernised=
> > >> version of the caste system. We need one law for one people,
anything=
> > >> else is just going to drive us further down the road of racism,
> > >> bigotry and tension.
>
> > > Dear Hunter, "U" state that "We need one law for one people" then
can
> > > "U" explain why in some states you can cultivate cannabis and not in
> > > other states, Can you also explain the reason that Victoria is the
> > > only states that still maintains the power to make laws for the
> > > Aboriginal Race, when all other states, handed the control and power
> > > over to the Federal Government. (1975?) =A0Is that what you class as
> > > racism,?
>
> > Dear "C", you are WRONG, There is NO STATE is Australia where it is
leag=
le
> > to cultivate cannabis, Period. Sadly I think your use of said drug has
> > placed large blinders on your already biased vision.
>
> > I strongly agree with Hunter on this, that the sooner you minority
group=
s
> > except the fact that dividing the nation with "Eception" laws is
simply
> > trouble and will further bread "racism, bigotry and tension".
>
> > No I think you and other dim witted asses like yorself are the CAUSE
not=
> > the cure.
>
> > Get it Brother?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> As you may be aware that in some states cultivation of Cannabis
> results in a small fine, $100 in south Australia, if the fine is not
> paid, in most case, little if any thing is done, the only party that
> benefits from prohibition of cannabis, is the legal profession, a
> private club, whose members can only be appointed to be a judge, a
> club that has more power then the peoples elected Parliament, Yes
> another Fact.
>
> I have posted prior the fact that the Victorian Government has no
> power to make Laws for the Aboriginal people of Victoria, I think that
> "U" and Hunter are one of the same, as you continually use racism, and
> avoid the true facts. Alcohol is the main cause of violence in the
> family and the wider community, is there and alternative. well try
> cannabis, as it may open your dimwitted mind.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Just to return to the begining the following is snipits form the Age
30,04/08QC claims program invented Corby story
DRIVEN by fear of losing viewers, Channel Seven's Today Tonight
"ramped up" allegations against Mercedes Corby and her family,
promising her former best friend $100,000 and a trip to Canada for an
interview, the NSW Supreme Court heard yesterday.
Mr Littlemore said that 2.6 million people viewed the first program on
February 12 last year. By the second night that was down by 400,000.
So the third program was promoted in the evening news and "ramped up"
by "deliberately asserting things that were not true".
Jodie Power, former best friend of Mercedes Corby, interviewed by the
presenter Anna Coren and the reporter Bryan Seymour, was claiming to
make disclosures about the Corby family.
In fact, she was driven by hatred towards Ms Corby, Mr Littlemore
said, the "celebrity" status from her "15 minutes of fame", and the
$100,000 Channel Seven had offered her, in addition to an all-expenses-
paid holiday in Canada.
Ms Power was "a woman with a very unfortunate problem with drugs".
Motivated by a desire to get revenge on Ms Corby, she was "a money-
hungry fabricator".
Ms Power had said in the programs that Mercedes, sister of Schapelle
Corby, who is imprisoned in Indonesia for trying to smuggle cannabis
into Bali, was herself a drug smuggler and had asked Ms Power to
smuggle drugs for her.
She had accused Mercedes Corby of asking Schapelle to smuggle drugs
into Bali, at one point asking Ms Power for help in watering "the
plants". She had accused Ms Corby of lying about her family's
involvement in drugs. Ms Power had said she was afraid for her life,
and by implication accused Ms Corby of threatening her.
Mr Littlemore said that on Today Tonight she was portrayed as having
fled Australia through fear of retribution from what she had said
publicly. In fact, she had gone overseas 10 days before the first
program went to air, on a planned holiday to Bali and Vanuatu that was
paid for by Channel Seven.
He said Coren and Seymour had "conspired" to produce "the most
sensational program they could by telling lies". Not only were the
claims untrue, they knew they were untrue.
If Mr Seymour and Channel Seven don't know whether it is true, why are
they here defending it as being true?" Mr Littlemore asked.
The trial, before Justice Carolyn Simpson and a jury of four, is
expected to take three weeks
Les
|
