Hunter01 wrote:
> Dinsdale Pirana wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:54:21 -0700 (PDT), anonymum
> > <anonymums@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in aus.culture.true-blue:
> >
> >> For the fathers lobby groups, its not enough - It will never be
> >> enough. Why? Because they were never after shared care, they want far
> >> more than that and they wont stop until mothers and childrens rights
> >> are abolished.
> >>
> >> Out of the ashes of destruction and devastation, we give birth to
> >> Anonymums.
> >>
> >
> > What a load of rubbish!
> >
> > The whole Child Sup****t system is geared against men. I was a
> > custodial parent one of the 5% of such men and was treated like ****.
>
>
>
> I agree with you completely on the gearing, the courts are so geared
> against blokes in cases like this it's not funny, and there is very good
> reason for a father's lobby group to try to equalise this out (you can
> blame the churchies for this mess),
but the "fathers lobby group" that
> posts in these forums are a pack of lunatics, I'd hate to see any child
> put in any of their hands as they do mad **** like trying to justify why
> a cowardly **** of a bloke would kill his own children, blaming women
> for their own dickless pathetic cowardice.
>
Why to fathers groups sup****t men convicted of domestic violence?
It makes sense that if they are sadistic enough to beat their wives
then surely the children are out of the question, yet these fathers
lobby groups advocate for this. If it was simply about the rights of
child sup****t reconising fathers when they say that they are caring
for the children,
Then that would be fine, but the child abuse cases? Domestic violence?
children getting killed out of vengeance? There needs to be a better
fathers rights representation that purely advocates for rights and
decent fathers but does not advocate for every junky dad, criminal,
murderer(there have been cases where children have been required to
see their dad who killed their mother or sibling in jail) and
rapist,
The fathers lobby groups(this includes the shared parenting council)
also recomend that rapists can block the abortion and go for custody
against their victim(too bad if the baby turns out to be a girl).
Until there is better representation, I would be happy to sup****t any
organisation against the agenda of the fathers lobby groups.
There needs to be a clear line between the cromanians and the
neaderthols otherwise we are just going backwards in human
behaviour.
I was disgusted to hear the other day of a mens line telling a guy who
had just beaten his wife that he is a doormat for getting anger
management counselling.
These father lobby groups and even some mens sup****t services are
creating and harvesting monsters. In the long run, if their attitudes
remain, fathers will have no rights at all.
> People like that are the worst form of enemy of people like yourself
> that are presumably good fathers just after a fair goal that is
> currently totally absent from our family court system.
|
